For 10 years I have been watching models of Russian trade forums People who have no idea about the goals of this technical market analysis comment on my posts. For example, my models combine the theory of the market of waves and patterns in combination with the theory of Gann. The only difference is that they correct and supplement these theories. This makes the job simple and straightforward. But for some reason they comment on my topic - morons Conclusion - and in Russian forums and here, the same idiots
It actually put me in mind of Malevich and his square, or perhaps his "white on white". The ooohs and aaahs of the "technical experts" over the subtlety, complexity, and brilliance of these seem eerily familiar...
Resto, If I may give some advice. From one dickhead to another. It would be nice if you attempted to infuse some humor into your dickbaggery. Otherwise youre just a boring every day, dime a dozen, dickhead. You need to step up your game.
I don’t need popularity, it’s just interesting for me to talk to professionals in the field of technical analysis, And such morons who are noted here are not interesting to me
For example, unlike the wave theory of the market, which implies the development of 3 to 11 waves, my models always have a complete cycle of 9 moves, and this stability can be traced on any instrument for more than 50 years Given the theory of the pattern - they reflect the work of 2 patterns at the same time, etc.