Hi Resto, Another approach would be using law of octave . you might be calculating 1/8,2/8,3/8,4/8 etc upto 8/8 for upside and the same for downside . which comes to 16 models . and you use time bar shift of 1-4 bars and predicting the market based on the model.
Hi Resto, And the last thing I can think about your charts are triangle decay method. I have not got the time to analyse .
This is what it means to know the price movement and close deals on time during intraday trading, it’s so funny to watch your professional traders who use sophisticated mathematical calculations that are of no real use. They have no reference point, no concept of time, no understanding of volatility - nothing, only empty demagogy based on dubious averaged indicators
for example, why should I talk to this moron Any competent technical analysis specialist knows that a Sharpe co-identifier can accidentally give a satisfactory result only in a state of market flatness and rely on his formula in the trend - money loss Why should I use BSM if its foundation, among other things, is based on Hubber's theory, and I showed the fallacy of this theory - here #3 Nov 4, 2019 or with this Any specialist in technical analysis knows that DiNapoli used fragments of the work of Elliott and Pessaiento - tearing separate pieces from these works he created some kind of stupidity and received a fee for the circulation of the next nonsense And even more, trend lines are never used. And when I read the posts of that jerk "BlueWaterSailor", the hair on my head stands on end
And annoying trolls I repeat Last week, I showed you how I got profit the entire downtrend in the intraday interval, and my trade with 1.22 has been working for a month and continues to bring me profit price movement is unpredictable only for fools
This is another play on the Elliott wave theory, and the Elliott theory itself is wrong You mean “Four-Dimensional Structures and Stock Market Cycles” and “Market Science”. it just another fantasy that has nothing to do with reality
Analysis, on the contrary, requires a lot of time and attention, and if you do not have time, you do not need to do this
you are very funny people here, For example, I can’t have a direct dialogue with your technical analysis specialists who have written a huge number of books on technical market analysis. But I was able to talk with a Russian author, for example, this https://smart-lab.ru/books/book_list/by_author/218 he wrote 2 books "Japanese candles" , "Market margin" and they are no different from what you read from Western experts And after one hour of conversation, he simply became silent and could no longer justify his nonsense. In the same way, I can talk with any of your reputable experts, and in an hour he will be speechless and acknowledge his stupidity The reason for this lies on the surface, they use the basic patterns that were developed at the beginning and middle of the last century, and it is here that the main mistakes are laid, and these morons instead of correcting these errors - they still cultivate them