Said what things? I don't think you know what i said, or something. I've long since withdrawn my offer for you and me to wash Sean Hannity's balls together. Looks like you are washing them yourself now. My basic take on the Ukranian situation is that we, the US, through our influence in NATO, have been picking a fight with Putin for a long, long, long time. Our media has been picking a fight for as long a time. Russia had a red line about admitting Ukraine into NATO, and we, the US, toyed with it, and may even have crossed it. While that was happening, Ukraine appeared, to Putin, to be gearing up for another shelling of ethnic Russian areas of the Ukraine. What is your problem with this analysis? Hannity, a Christian and big FOX celebrity, agrees with you and your war-hawk buddies. Dr. Steve Turley, yet another Christian and mega MAGA, agrees more with me. So i will link to his point of view on this:
The context you are pushing for these charts is laughable. Let's take a look at the reality from a reputable news source. Fact check: Vote spikes in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania do not prove election fraud https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-...nia-do-not-prove-election-fraud-idUSKBN27Q307 Social media users have been sharing posts claiming that during the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4 there were vote dumps of hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots only for Democrat Joe Biden in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, suggesting this proves voter fraud allegations. These vote spikes did occur, but they also included Trump votes, accounted for largely left-leaning urban counties, and one state experienced a clerical error. The posts (here , here , here , here) appear to originate from a tweet (here) by Nick Adams, who describes himself as a bestselling author endorsed by President Trump (twitter.com/NickAdamsinUSA). The tweet, posted at 12:48 a.m. GMT on Nov. 5, 2020, says: “Between 3:40-4:30AM, they “found” 140,000 mail in ballots for Biden in Wisconsin. Between 3:30-5:00AM, they “found” 200,000 mail in ballots for Biden in Michigan. Between 2:00-4:00AM, they “found” 1,000,000 mail in ballots in Pennsylvania. All for Biden. None for Trump.” Comments and captions say, “Fraud!!”; “Fraud gone rampant”; “A fraud is a fraud.” A spokesman for data analysis website FiveThirtyEight ( fivethirtyeight.com/ ) told Reuters via email that the jumps in Michigan and Wisconsin were due to counties releasing large batches of results all at once and that the votes were not just for Biden. One large jump of almost 140,000 ballots in Michigan was due to a clerical error that has since been resolved. In Pennsylvania both the Trump and Biden campaign gained around 1 million votes on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4. Reuters has previously debunked claims that vote spikes prove Democrats are trying to steal the election in Wisconsin and Michigan ( here ). WISCONSIN The posts claim that 140,000 ballots for Biden were found in Wisconsin on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4. There was a jump in votes for Biden on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4, but this was because Milwaukee County, home to the largest city in the states of Wisconsin, reported its 170,000 absentee votes, which were overwhelmingly Democrat ( here ). FiveThirtyEight published a graph of the jump in votes in Wisconsin at 8:27 a.m. EST on Nov. 4 on its election live blog (here) alongside this explanation by reporter Maggie Koerth: “Biden was down in Wisconsin before the Milwaukee absentee results came in early this morning. The boost pushed him up past Trump, but the race in this state is still very, very tight.” FiveThirtyEight told Reuters that it is not true that Biden received all the votes in the overnight dump: “These batches were NOT 100% Biden votes; behind the blue line, there is also a red line representing the thousands of votes Trump gained. There are also counter examples, where Trump’s line shoots up suddenly when a favorable batch of results are reported.” MICHIGAN The social media posts claim that 200,000 mail in ballots for Biden were found in Michigan on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4. There was a jump in votes for Biden in Michigan of approximately 200,000 around 6:00 a.m. EST as shown in the FiveThirtyEight election blog update at 8:27 a.m. EST on Nov. 4 ( here ), which explains that this was due to a “tranche” of new votes from Wayne County, home to Detroit, where Biden led Trump at the time 67% to 32%. FiveThirtyEight told Reuters this overnight vote increase in Michigan also did not solely consist of votes for Biden. The spike in Democrat votes in Michigan was just after 6:00 a.m. EST, not 3:30-5:00 a.m. as the posts suggest. There was also confusion over the Biden vote count in Michigan during the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4, when Biden received 153,710 votes in Shiawassee County, instead of 15,371, meaning his vote count jumped by much more than expected ( here , here ). Several social media users pointed out the jump in votes (archive.is/nQzbT , archive.is/bUjJb), including President Trump (here) . The tweets showed screenshots of the change in vote tallies on the elections map by Decision Desk HQ, an election data service (results.decisiondeskhq.com/), where Biden’s count jumped from 1,992,356 to 2,130,695 while Trump’s tally stayed at 2,200,902. However, Decision Desk HQ explained in a Twitter thread that the jump in votes was as a result of a “clerical error” in Shiawassee County, where an extra zero had been added to Biden’s vote tally here . Decision Desk HQ updated its data to show that Biden received 15,371 votes in Shiawassee (here). PENNSYLVANIA The posts claim that there was a spike of 1,000,000 mail in votes for Biden in Pennsylvania on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4. The FiveThirtyEight election blog update at 8:29 a.m. EST on Nov. 4 by Dan Hopkins, which shows a graph of the Pennsylvania vote count on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4 ( here ) does not show a dump of 1 million votes for Biden alone. Between 12 a.m. and 6 a.m. EST the graph says that both Trump and Biden’s votes increased by approximately 1 million. The biggest increase was from midnight to 3 a.m. after which the tallies stayed very stable, not 2:00-4:00 a.m. as the social media posts suggest. VERDICT Partly false. The vote spikes did occur, but they were not only Biden votes and can be explained by pro-Biden county vote dumps and a clerical error. The timings of when ballots were received in Michigan and Pennsylvania are not accurate. ===================================== And some additional information from reputable sources... Fact check: Biden vote spikes and county recount do not prove Democrats are trying to steal the election in Michigan and Wisconsin https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-...ction-in-michigan-and-wisconsin-idUSKBN27L2RL Fact check: Typo led to false post about Michigan votes showing up 'magically' for Biden https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-false-post-michigan-votes-biden/6164385002/ Graph shows thousands of ballots reported at once, overwhelmingly for Biden https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9647421250 Claim: Early morning election results from Michigan and Wisconsin show voter fraud. No, these FiveThirtyEight graphs don’t prove voter fraud https://www.politifact.com/factchec...se-fivethirtyeight-graphs-dont-prove-voter-f/
More opinion disguised as fact. Look up what really happened and Russian's aggression is seen in a different light; https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Ukraine-Nuclear-Weapons
And the predictable response from the delusional will be some form of "my ignorance is on equal footing as your knowledge"
You are pointing to one ongoing court case regarding electors, and one case where one judge dismissed a Trump suit. You haven't pointed to any case that involves, directly, the charts i posted. Probably the electors involved in the court case were aware of the charts i posted, and those charts might have raised their suspicions early on. But they might have other evidence that corroborates that evidence, hence their effort to rectify the elector situation in that state. One judge, dismissing a case is not impressive. Could easily be politics. Judges are not immune to partisanship, and could care less about the principle of recusal. I'm not aware the Trump case specifically introduced these charts in their attempt to open a case, are you?
My offer to wash Sean Hannity's balls together was for exGOP, and it has since been withdrawn. I didn't offer to wash Sean Hannity's balls together with you. Maybe you and exGOP can wash Sean Hannity's balls together yourselves?
I don't consider Reuters to be less than a flaming partisan trying to disguise itself as a big unbiased news operation. Here is an example of what Reuters is recently up to:
62 Trump "Election Fraud" Lawsuits --- 61 Losses. The sole "win" -- A Pennsylvania judge ruled voters had 3 days after the election to provide proper ID and "cure" their ballots. This impacted a mere dozen ballots. By the numbers: President Donald Trump's failed efforts to overturn the election Trump and allies filed scores of lawsuits, tried to convince state legislatures to take action, organized protests and held hearings.. None of it worked. https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/n...efforts-overturn-election-numbers/4130307001/
Bitchute is the home of Nazi's and Anti-Vaxxers who got kicked off of YouTube. Hard to find a video on Bitchute which is not complete insane extremist bullshiat. But... of course this video post of yours is just your typical re-direct with pushing more crap from bullshiat mountain. Let's take a look at the reality with Reuters -- which is considered one of the top two most factual and unbiased news sources on the face of the earth. Reuters These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources. Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/