which is why I said present the links. You really need to step up the integrity. You know damn well that post was said in fun and it was on the same page as this post. The template I chose for pretty much the entire thread that year - projected an Obama victory... "as I posted on another thread... here is my summary of this thread. polls slanted greater to the Dems than the 2008 the template are leftist frauds... and they should be chastised. This will include the crazy predictions made by nate silver. polls with the 2008 template are leftists, fools, or blind. even axelrod said last night they will not do as well as 2008. poll between 2010 and 2008 are professional... perhaps a little partisan as they get closer to 2008. polls with 2010... are perhaps a bit partisan to the Rs but smart. but IMO polls should slanted more to the Is and the Rs because that is what the turnout on Tuesday will teach us. all these pollsters... underweighted the Is." 2. that other quote was written in 2009. Many Many times after I explained this... https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...ld-adeposea-obama.234014/page-50#post-3444199 "I told you and your loon friends there would be a hearing this issue. you all said never. My prediction was proven accurate. There was a hearing... Obama defaulted instead of presenting proof of eligibility to be President. All he would had to do was present your beloved birth certificate from HI under oath. He chose to default. If that makes you feel good, you have a warped sense of the rule of law or patriotism."
sure they were made in fun jem here are the links. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...ating-higher-than-obamas.183250/#post-2645612 https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/romney-looks-like-the-next-pres.240772/page-335#post-3671750
Donald Trump Jr. Has Hired A Lawyer Who Has Handled Organized Crime And Cybercrime Cases Meanwhile at Breitbart - The ‘Russian Lawyer Meeting’ Story Is a Giant Red Herring Scientologists look at the Trump cult and go "dang, these guys are extreme!"
When did opposition research become illegal? According to the article the Russian attorney said she had information that individuals connected to Russia were funding the DNC and supporting Clinton. In other words, she said that she had information that Clinton and the DNC were colluding with Russia.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...times-russian-lawyer-meeting-story-fake-news/ Someone allegedly offered opposition research to the campaign — something that happens all the time, as the Clinton campaign knew well, since it was digging up dirt on Donald Trump anywhere it thought it could find it, including foreign sources. The Times called the lawyer “Kremlin-connected,” but there is no reason that the Trump team would have suspected that (and the lawyer herself appeared to deny any such connection in the Times article).
It's not the specific meeting that's important. It's the number of shady touchpoints involving high level Russian people. Especially as they relate to this election. And then the Trump administration is constantly found lying about them.