Oh, okay. Well, USA Today has a much higher rating than CNN, therefore, disregard CNN's bias subjective mixed factual opinion. USA Today must be correct according to your criteria because they have a rating of High wrt factual reporting. BTW - USA Today has a higher rating than WSJ. Therefore, I win this one. Thank for playing your game.
So you lost the previous argument and you pose a question at an attempt of deflection. Are you a sore loser? Do you have a hard time admitting that you are wrong? I used your own criteria.
You've gone full retard....what argument? That a depleted stockpile would've been restocked by a competent president who wouldn't be putting orders in 3 months into a full blown pandemic?
WHO Faces Mounting Backlash For Covering For China https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/04/05/who_faces_mounting_backlash_for_covering_for_china_506911.html
I am so pissed at that WHO crew I am not going to even read that link. But whatever it says, I believe it even moreso, even if the word moreso is tautologically incorrect.
this thread may be of interest: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/donald-trump-the-buck-stops-elsewhere.335800/ And that's what happens when you lose leverage to other countries willing to fund "impartial" organizations who depend on charity: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/02/1...ronavirus-state-department-usaid-budget-cuts/ Trump Seeks to Halve U.S. Funding for World Health Organization as Coronavirus Rages The president’s new budget would cut more than $3 billion in global health programs.
Let's just say that China has been getting a good return on their contributions to the WHO. They start a frigging pandemic that takes the entire world down, then WHO praises them and presents them as a model for epidemic management and seemingly knows nothing about their biolabs and wet markets. Yeh, and Orange Man Bad for not funding them more. And because you lefties are in the tank for both China and the UN it creates a dilemma for you: How to stick your head up the arses of both of them at the same time.