Even though the training data spanned more than 55 years, I'm not too surprised a genetic program strategy with so many inputs could show good results after training. So with six independent models trained on the same data, I ran a test on an out-of-sample period of 1238 input instances for 1957-12-26 through 1962-11-23. Independent means the random number generator used for the training has a different sequence. When 3 or more of the top 7 rules for any of the models had a signal, the simulated number of trades was 266 with 125 wins (a win is greater than 1.6560 percent gain) and had a mean gain of 100 * exp(1.2726 / 100) - 100 == 1.2807 percent. For this test period, the mean gain for trades taken on all days was 100 * exp(0.519945877769271 / 100) - 100 == 0.5213 percent. The test results were significantly better than the mean result for the entire test period. So maybe this type of system is almost usable.
You may want to start a hedge fund with these 2 authors and trading "gurus": https://www.amazon.com/Traders-Guide-Financial-Astrology-Forecasting/dp/1118369394/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=larry+trading+astrology&qid=1564331020&s=gateway&sr=8-1
With all the books, articles and videos having Larry Pesavento's name attached, he probably doesn't have time for out-of-this-world business ventures.
I guess that way would save a lot of monkey chow and typewriter ribbons. But if the library was ever completed, this might happen.
Not only have you confused many readers here with the concept of "typewriter ribbons", but then you introduce the concept of how God could not kill the universe because of physics? You are a crazy man.
Dedicated to astrology: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/highly-recommended-trading-book.358298/ Enjoy the ride to fortune