Annual PnL statement 2017 - Winner will be awarded a prize!

Discussion in 'Trading' started by rin4et, Nov 22, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JackRab

    JackRab

    I like a good conspiracy... what lies are you telling @Overnight ;)
     
    #21     Nov 22, 2017
    Trader447 likes this.
  2. rin4et

    rin4et

    #22     Nov 22, 2017
  3. Overnight

    Overnight

    I just asked him/her in a PM. Let us see what the answer is.
     
    #23     Nov 22, 2017
  4. JackRab

    JackRab

    #24     Nov 22, 2017
    schweiz and tommcginnis like this.
  5. rin4et

    rin4et

    I did not limit this thread to strictly equities. Anyone is welcome. Futures, option traders, forex, commodities etc. And fair enough. I don't believe there is anyone on ET making more than 200k a year day trading in 2017. But I welcome to be proved wrong.
     
    #25     Nov 22, 2017
  6. Robert Morse

    Robert Morse Sponsor

    OK, I'll play along and I don't even need proof. Let's' start with you. What was your:

    Starting equity in your trading account in 2017?
    Asset classes you traded?
    Basic strategy?
    YTD P/L?
    Is that what you expected to make? Better/Worse?

    Care to share?

    Bob
     
    #26     Nov 22, 2017
  7. Overnight

    Overnight

    You did not list that as a metric of your "contest". You just asked for people to list their PnL broker statements. ??
     
    #27     Nov 22, 2017
  8. Overnight

    Overnight

    Brilliant "contest" rin4et, I might actually pay YOU 200 bux to go away, in REAL CASH. I can make that in 30 seconds with one contract if I time it right.
     
    #28     Nov 22, 2017
  9. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    The great and all knowing Zandy wins this competition hands down.
    :D
     
    #29     Nov 22, 2017
    tommcginnis and JackRab like this.
  10. JackRab

    JackRab

    I wish marsman was back... he would blow this thing out of the water
     
    #30     Nov 22, 2017
    vanzandt and ironchef like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.