Zzzz.. IQ level

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Holmes, Aug 3, 2006.

What do you think Zzz.... IQ level is?

  1. What IQ? He has no brains!

    10 vote(s)
    25.6%
  2. 1-5

    7 vote(s)
    17.9%
  3. 5-9

    1 vote(s)
    2.6%
  4. 10-19

    2 vote(s)
    5.1%
  5. 20-30

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. I have not got a clue, seems pretty normal

    5 vote(s)
    12.8%
  7. He is brighter than Einstein! 250+

    14 vote(s)
    35.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. James, these guys are a bunch of four-year-olds, you're quite right.
     
    #41     Aug 4, 2006
  2. This is worse than 4 year olds. Four year olds can be caught. You're refusing to be taught.

    Let me repeat it, slowly, and expand the explanation. Hopefully you'll finally understand.

    1. You flamed Z because he disagrees with you. The "He did it first" excuse was just that, an excuse. I haven't seen you guys flame anyone else who crossed the line but were politically in agreement with you.

    2. I am not going to argue whether Z did or did not do the bad things that you claimed he did. He can be banned again if he violates the rules of this forum. But even if he did, that does not give you the excuse to cross the line yourselves.

    Was that slow enough for you to understand now?
     
    #42     Aug 4, 2006
  3. Where is your sense of humor?:D
    [​IMG]
     
    #43     Aug 4, 2006
  4. Are you an utter and complete idiot, traderNik? THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NOT AN INCH OF PROOF IN HAPABOY'S POST! Proof would have been a link or something. It was just hearsay.

    I'm amazed - are you still in kindergarden? I though you guys were doing debating championships in school? Oh wait. Yes, you do. And what you learn there is rhetorical tricks, not proper argumentation technique.
     
    #44     Aug 4, 2006
  5. I guess since Pabst posts something, it constitutes PROOF in your world. Oh yeah, Colin Powel had PROOF of WMDs as well. lol
     
    #45     Aug 4, 2006
  6. You're quite the loser, Longhorns, for getting agitated on an anonymous internet forum... That's what all you trolls have in common actually; you get veeery agitated. Don't you have real lives?
     
    #46     Aug 4, 2006
  7. Thanks, Holmes, you made my day there. I though people like you preferred attacking, namecalling and trolling everyone you disagree with instead of using ignore. On second thoughts, I am suprised you know how to use it. But then again, it would have to be a necessity for you to continue on Chit Chat and Politics & Religion - there's just too much scum out there for you. Perhaps you should look elsewhere? Oh, such a shame that you can't answer me because you've chosen to ignore me... I'll live on, I can assure you.
     
    #47     Aug 4, 2006
  8. To me it seems like most Republicans on this board have no sense of humour. At least the ones patrolling this part of ET.
     
    #48     Aug 4, 2006
  9. Holmes

    Holmes

    OK guys, I have gotten a pretty good idea of where everyone stands and I am asking the moderator to close the thread.

    Thanks to all those who have voted and I'll leave making any conclusions to yourself. (Otherwise I may start another flame war :eek: )

    Holmes
     
    #49     Aug 4, 2006

  10. Take ZZZ's cock out of your mouth and get back to work at the dry cleaners...I want my shirts ready by 5:00pm.
     
    #50     Aug 4, 2006
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.