Yeh, i'm mad, mad for the talk of twats. There's always some cunt on here talking about this that or the other. What a load of bollocks! Why don't you give me an answer to this post without the smug smiley? I'll tell you what, Why don't you ask me what i am doing on this site if that's all i'm up to? And before any of you question my sanity..... FUCK OFF! You one line, inbread, shortsighted fucks. HAVE A NICE DAY!
The sum of all your arguments between the two groups is zero. The same as stock market. Right! Why does the sum of all your arguments is zero? Because it's still undecided, it means that the result is zero. If one argument win over another then it has been decided, the result is not zero. And therefore this thread should be closed. But it's still continuing... same way as the market continue... if one group win (money) over another then the market is stopped. You see the proof of zero-sum! When should we start the poll?
Yeah, I want the vote! I tried to make a vote, but it didn't look like I was making it. Anyway, the choices should be: The stockmarket is a .... game. 1. zero sum 2. non-zero sum 3. negative sum 4. positive sum 5. none of the above 6. I don't know The correct answer is... Because I am an evil person, I decided to add to the confusion, so I am going to provide examples: 1. Zero sum: a penny stock that vegetates for years. (not counting commission and spread) 2. Non-zero sum: the stockmarket itself, in general (psst, correct answer) 3. Negative sum: AMZN between 1999 Dec and 2001 Sept, losing 90%+ of its value thus destroying wealth. 4. Positive sum: MSFT between IPO and 1999 Dec, multiplying countless times thus creating wealth. 5. None of the above: you are really clueless. 6. I don't know: at least you are honest.
Lets get accurate. Take YM; not the stock market. For every purchase there is sale. Open and shut: a zero sum game. Take off commission or dealing spread; it becomes a slightly negative balance game. Know what you're doing: this mother is a cornucopia.