This is the kind of blanket statement that makes me want to skip over your posts. To me it indicates a lack of discernment. Neither Democrats nor Republicans want to destroy the 1st and 2nd Amendments. They have some differences in how they would like to see them implemented. I would encourage you to try and see a little less black and white and a little more gray.
I think it's instructive that Pwnedexter didn't just quote the various passages, but screen-captured them. In this way, you cannot conveniently go to each of the original posts and see to what it was in response to. I'm sure Pwnedexter intended it that way. Because it would otherwise make him look exactly as he was characterized in those quotes.
So, either you disassociate all of those who are rioting whenever a conservative speaker is scheduled at a university, or you have a warped view on what the 1st Amendment represents.
Hehe, he edited some down for propaganda purposes. These were I recall (mostly) from one day where I was busy trading so just running with fairly quick STFU fake etc. Basically measuring how he would react to the repetition. Hit gold on that one.
Absolutely. And all in one day. Check it out; dude has serious issues: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/mueller-has-a-tiger-by-the-tail.322022/page-8#post-4672278 Once again, you "think" wrong. I did it because Tsing has Slartocchio on ignore.
Ha ha ha. Why does that frog remind me so much of jem creating yet another black hole? Hilarious. Thank you.
Frederick Foresight posted that first, tis a good one. Pointypwn probably worked for years in a place that was toxic with politics, the sort of inbred institutional stuff that now means he can't function without "enemies" to obsess over. When I allowed him to think he was on ignore (I do have self-control) he disappeared as he had no supply.