you really are canyon...:eek: exact same argument without content - really, claiming you still don't understand my position represents an unrivalled exhibition of thickheadedness and comprehension difficulties warranting professional help - and same smiley at the same place. bye bye, canyon/TM_Direct brent scowcroft, national security advisor to presidents gerald ford & george bush senior: Don't Attack Saddam It would undermine our antiterror efforts http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110002133
lol. canyon/tm at his dissembling games again: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=10826&perpage=6&pagenumber=15
Are you delusional? I posted that previously....Im not hiding and you can look up my info and contact me directly....I asked you before and im asking again if you could ease up with the posting of other people's articles because qutie frankly.....nobody wants to read them. if you want you can pm me so you can see im not canyon man.
look, that's what i'd claim in your case, too, haha. but your incoherence and non-arguments are the exacty the same as those of canyon, so, no dice.:eek:
You are such a sleuth by the way....how you figured out that canyon and me were the same people.....wow, if you were working in the pentagon, i bet 9-11 would never have happened!! ....can i ask youa question sherlock holmes? Why would anyone make up two ID's and talk about the same thing? What would be he purpose?
....well at least i got you to communicate without using articles from the dutch socialist times or some other paper!!!
hey, canyon, let's go nuke saddam, because he is such a terrible threat to all of us, never mind international terrorism, and, btw, don't forget to look under your bed tonight...
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i DON'T KNOW WHAT IS FUNNIER, YOUR CLAIMS OF IRAQ OR THE WAY YOU ARE CARRYING ON THAT IM CANYON!!! You are sriously making me and a co-worker crack up...especially the way you are so sure we are one in the same... that's ok though but if you want proof call up elite..i spoke with barron this morning. you are a funny man but your starting to act like mel gibson in the conspiracy theory....
why, canyon, what claims re iraq? you're the one in the camp of our great lier and fact twister in chief, terrorist dubya, after all, who is the one claiming there is any need to go after war? President Bush's case against Saddam Hussein, outlined in a televised address to the nation on Monday night, relied on a slanted and sometimes entirely false reading of the available US intelligence, government officials and analysts claimed yesterday. http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story...,807286,00.html ======================== For Bush, Facts Are Malleable http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...1¬Found=true ======================== C.I.A. Warns That a U.S. Attack May Ignite Terror http://www.nytimes.com/auth/login?U...ast/09IRAQ.html ========================= brent scowcroft, national security advisor to presidents gerald ford & george bush senior: Don't Attack Saddam It would undermine our antiterror efforts http://www.opinionjournal.com/edito...ml?id=110002133
You are making a fool out of yourself.....but i see your back to quoting others becuase you don't have your own opinion. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! im going to pm you my info...or you can just look up my profiel yourself.