Your Tax Dollars at Work: Citi Buys New Corporate Jet

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by richardyu301, Jan 26, 2009.

  1. Because Citi DID want the money and asked for it and because Citi was all for a bank bailout plan. And don't mistake my displeasure with Citi as a lack thereof for Paulson. Don't even get me started on government.
     
    #31     Jan 27, 2009
  2. The issue here is not what these executives do!
    The question should be what the US taxpayer going to do about it?

    NOTHING..........
     
    #32     Jan 27, 2009
  3. bit

    bit

    lol. Paulson, GS, C... yeah, there's no connection there...
     
    #33     Jan 27, 2009
  4. Banjo

    Banjo

    #34     Jan 27, 2009
  5. 9999

    9999

    From the article above:

    "Agnew said buyers typically pay a few percentage points of the purchase price when placing the order, then a series of payments as production begins and other milestones are reached. They might pay about 35 percent of the cost before taking delivery, then pay the balance when taking the plane, he said. At that rate, Citi could have already spent $17.5 million on a plane it will no longer receive."

    Just what I thought. At this point the best thing would have been to get it and resell it right away.
     
    #35     Jan 27, 2009
  6. bfft no one cares. futures surging

    Dow 8,167.00 74.00 0.91
    S&P 500 848.60 9.40 1.12
    NASDAQ 100 1,197.25 11.50 0.97
     
    #36     Jan 27, 2009
  7. Banff01

    Banff01

    Daal,

    you have some kind of wierd logic. The question IS NOT if THEY NEED A PLANE? The question is CAN THEY AFFORD A PLANE?
    If you're getting BILLIONS in help from the tax payers then you CLEARLY CAN'T AFFORD a private plane.
    Think about it. It's that simple.



     
    #37     Jan 27, 2009
  8. Banff01

    Banff01

    It's astounding that it takes newspaper articles and public uproar for them to cancel such a dumbass plan. Their arrogance is unbelievable. Those execs should all be fired. I can't believe that government is paying these incompetents billions of dollars. I say it's money wasted because this company will go down anyway unless the whole leadership is replaced.


     
    #38     Jan 27, 2009
  9. Replaced by whom? The incompetents at Treasury and the Fed?

    Nature has a way of dealing with incompetence - failure. The most competent and correct action that government can take is to get out of the way and to not suck wealth creators dry to keep a steady flow of funds streaming into the black holes that are these wealth destroyers.

    The fact that nobody in government is competent enough to understand that means that they all should also be fired - without pensions.
     
    #39     Jan 27, 2009
  10. Banff01

    Banff01

    I agree with you, Angrycat. Government should only provide guarantees and supervise an orderly bankruptcy and closure of shops like City. No money should be given to them to try to revive them. It's money wasted and their new corporate jet plan clearly shows that even in crises of this proportion they have learned nothing.
     
    #40     Jan 27, 2009