http://www.steelmarkonline.com/purchase_downloads.htm "Is "harder" evidence needed for you to accept the possibility of a real UFO contact? As an additional means to prove their existence, the Pleiadians gave Billy Meier several metal samples. One metal specimen was examined by Dr. Marcel Vogel, as research chemist at the IBM research laboratories in San Jose, California. His concluded that the metal specimen he examined "could not have been created on earth with any known technology." Learn the full details in the Metallurgical Analysis Document."
If Pat Robertson is my poster child, then here is yours: http://www.famousidiot.com/index.php?celebrity_id=98
Doesn't it seem a bit suspicious to you that with supposedly thousands upon thousands of landing here on our fair planet that only metal samples have supposedly been left behind?
You're still not giving any direct, or really even indirect, answer to my question. Let's start with an just one doctrine of yours: Atlantis. Who are your witnesses? Why do you hold that to be true? Upon what authority? What evidence do you have? That's all I'm asking is for a straight answer to these easy questions.
Well if metal from a space craft is not good enough, what kind of proof will you need for Atlantis? Would underwater columns and carved stonework be a little "suspicious" too? JohnnyK
More underwater civilization. http://www.physics.leidenuniv.nl/us...ndex.html?underwater_ruins/bimini/gallery.htm
Tamar George was there as Persephone. Gives first hand accounts. http://www.tamargeorge.com/ Including past life proofs!
http://www.xpeditionsmagazine.com/magazine/articles/japan/japan.html Also. Never argue with a person who thinks the world is 6000 years old. There is no enlightenment at the end of that tunnel.