You do understand that death is not the only condition that makes something serious? How Covid Affects the Heart Three years into the pandemic, the short- and long-term risks are becoming more clear. Also 1 in 5000 were supposed to die? So how many did you expect to die in the US based on your 'data'?
This regards vaxxes in general, not the CoVaxes. Fully vaxxed according to schedule v unvaxxed children. The following vaxxed were not necessarily fully vaxxed with the entire recommended schedule. but at least partial.
This nonsense from Hooker and Miller has already been widely debunked as completely untrue. Cherry picking data to drive your pre-determined conclusion is not a proper research methodology. It should be noted that Brian Hooker is part of the anti-vax "Children's Health Defense" organization started by RFK Jr. An organization which regularly pushes disinformation about vaccines. This paper is simply one example of many by Hooker and others who are part of "Children's Health Defense" anti-vax organization. Brian Hooker co-wrote a book with RFK Jr. pushing vaccination lies -- a book that contains not a shred of factual information or truth. Claim by Brian Hooker that unvaccinated children are healthier compared to vaccinated children relies on flawed studies https://healthfeedback.org/claimrev...-compared-vaccinated-children-flawed-studies/
Steve Kirsch Substack: Do you know what "safe and effective" means according to the CDC? I'm going to tell you. Safe means tested in 50 people and nobody died and only 8% needed professional medical attention. Effective means there is NO evidence whatsoever of a clinical benefit. Got it? The 8% refers to the upper box on the left.
From Malone's Substack: in the FDA’s Guidance for Industry: “Considering Whether an FDA-Regulated Product Involves the Application of Nanotechnology” does not mention “lipids” anywhere within its text. While lipids are a common component in multiple pharmacological preparations, this seems to be the first market authorized vaccine product with bioengineered lipid nanoparticles. It should have been obvious to mRNA manufacturers and/or the FDA that both LNPs and liposomes can be highly and similarly programmable to target specific cell receptors, and that LNPs should have been subject to special attention and testing for safety prior to their extensive implementation. Yet, it remains unknown if any such safety tests occurred during “warp speed” development, followed by the aforementioned profanely lucrative mRNA injection rollout. “Safe and Effective?” LNPs and Spike Proteins and Life-Threatening Inflammatory-Related Adverse Events Several studies have shown that spike proteins from either the mRNA shots or infection are toxic in a dose-dependent manner. The mRNA injections can turn one’s own cells into manufacturing machines compulsively replicating just the toxic engineered SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at a potentially greater rate than what would be via a community acquired COVID infection. While a healthy immune system will build antibodies and fight SARS-CoV-2 viral particles, attenuating replication, an mRNA injection has the potential to produce more coronavirus spike proteins, and at a higher rate, depending on the number/load of mRNA strands in the “vaccine” injection. As of now, we still don’t have transparency on the number of mRNA strands in a single injection or lot-to-lot variability. In addition to the independent toxicity of spike proteins, there is a history showing that certain LNPs by themselves have independent toxicity and are known to activate the complement (inflammatory) system. In fact, Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA delivery in animal models has written about how he was never able to overcome toxicity of any lipid-based delivery mRNA or DNA, eventually shuttering lipids as a delivery vehicle – and that was back in the 1990s. Was the FDA not aware of that history?
Robert Malone and all his fabricated bullshiat and his numerous fact-checked statements that are completely false have been discussed many times in the past. Only an idiot would use Robert Malone's substack as a source of information -- it is one of the most disreputable sources on the Internet.