<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/skkCpnCm7iM?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/skkCpnCm7iM?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Comon, it's the same politician... Outside of healthcare, they have the same policies... If you give Bush a tan and a teleprompter, you have Obama.
While i agree that they are basically both big spending morons who dont give a shit about peoples rights, Obama would have went drastically further left if he would have had the votes for his agenda, there is no way bush would have ever signed cap and trade into law, plus there was talk about limiting CEO salaries, and Obamas desire to soak the rich to pay for entitlements. So there is still lots of differences. With that said basically every politician has become a pig using taxpayer money to buy votes so they can give themselves more power.
Yah, I agree the rhetoric has been different, but actual policy??? Not very different, other than health care of course. I can't think of much that has been different. Bailouts, corporate welfare, wars, gitmo, open border policy, de facto amnesty... I guess you have a point w/cap and trade, but it's not law yet, and that bill seems a bit nebulous too...