They aren't, unless mutually agreed / single player experience. It was a joy to watch Alfa Star beating anonymous best players from all around the world. On the top, it learned on the way. Word. Usually it would be the same brutal force combined with speed, but sometimes unseen trick / tactic where it would leave you like, - ,,Wait. What... ?" And ocf rooting for human players all time. But even with 2 x weaker version, those victories were but a few. Ain't that much to watch in FPS tho. It sees you > 95% accuracy/all the time/head > human player/s dead.
Thats how they catch cheaters in tournamets (~$500 k prizes), when some guy is, playing, too-good. Then it turns out he has a bot program running in the background.
It's anti-white and supports ridiculous double standards. True unbiased AI wouldn't do that. You'd make a good stooge to feed energy into it, though.
It is no longer a free project, it is commercial now. So they are forced to be biased. Otherwise it will be relentlessly attacked by the left wing media/cancel culture mob and lose business. Same with most CEOs of most companies, they want the easy life to keep cashing in the big CEO pay check, so cave to the mob, rather than fight it. Most are not Elon Musk.
At the core AI simply do google searches really fast and then report to you a solution, without getting too biased towards certain opinions of "manipulation of the ai in order to solve a certain agenda", remember that for the 99% the output you get is just a by-product of the current state of the internet (the first result you get on google when searching something). That explains why some answers are biased, the ai looks for them on recent articles and reports, those reports are made by biased media companies that have their agenda. Of course I'm not neglecting the fact that ai developers can/had modified certain outputs in order to meet certain agenda. Anyway it's only the beginning, thinking about what will happen in the future is just speculation, don't be too pessimistic.