So you are saying I am not peter james rhys morgan? If I am do you accept my work is cited and of value?
I produced a paper in 2006 that has direct extracts taken from it that were introduced into the now Pension Tax Manual. The paper which is now a book has a letter from the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the time the pension reforms were made that thanks me for the work and states his intention to use the work in the future as conservative party pension policy. In addition to that the book has been passed through the approval process for global publication that required the government departments involved to authorise it. The permission process is extensive. The fact that I can publish the book including the declarations of approval and the letter from the Chancellor of the Exchequer is evidence of the paper's influence and use. I have been listening to what you have been saying about governmental references. They tend not to reference the sources for their work, you get letters and approval for publication. However I would like to have more accreditation for the use of my work, so I will push for this in the future. At the moment I am trying to support Treasury departments with the Coronavirus.
I don't really care who you are and who you pretend to be. I'm just saying that it's not by giving links to citations that you'll prove who you are, whoever you are. If I say I'm Bernanke, it's not by providing you links to Bernanke citations that'll prove anything. Again, I don't give a damn who you are. If you say you're Marilyn Monroe or Michael Jackson, so be it.
I had to go through the whole of the then Registered Pension Schemes Manual and make suggestions to reform it. If you want the full evidence of it I can show you letters I wrote giving specific recommendations of how to change the technical manual regulations with letters of feedback from the politicians and government ministers. I have linked to a page that has some influential letters in it that I wrote. It is an example of the letters I sent at the time before the pension regulation updates were made, they have followed my instructions. A short list of the recommendation I make that were introduced. RPSM 0510 1130 Migrant Member Relief allowed pension scheme funds to be transferred internationally and retain pension tax relief. This has been updated to prevent international pension fund transfer unless there is a 25% fee or tax paid. The ability to pay into a pension scheme after starting income drawdown, which was previously not allowed. The increase in corporate bond issuance and the requirement of pension funds to hold fixed income investments. It increased from £100 billion to £300 billion over the last decade. The introduction of the mandatory employer pension contributions in the UK to conform to IASIE four pillar pension saving guidelines. This was put forward in Euro Crisis Aggregate Demand Control is European Single Currency Weakness. Then the use of 'Pension Priming', 'Pension Pumping' and 'Optimal Pension Saving', which had never been performed before. http://morganisteconomics.blogspot.com/2020/10/influential-letter-submitted-by.html
It is who I am and I only put the links up to provide the evidence someone else requested. I see it as a courtesy.
Yes I just remembered I can provide what you are requesting, so to conform to your request I will do so. The book Euro Crisis Aggregate Demand Control is European Single Currency Weakness 2012 is listed on the European University Institute's (EUI) list of 'The Euro' resources. The EUI has been given the status of European Documentation Centre (EDC), meaning it has approval to be a depository of European Union documents and publications. The United Kingdom was in the European Union at the time and followed the recommended introduction of the policy to make pension contributions by employers mandatory under the guidelines of the IASIE's four pillar model for pension saving. This was subsequently implemented in the United Kingdom and the book the policy recommendation was made in is listed as a European Union document and publication. The United Kingdom also starting using alterations in pension saving rates, which the book puts forward and was supported by the paper 'The Pension Problem' 2006, which has a letter in it from the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the time the pension reforms were introduced thanking me for the work and stating an intention to use it. The link is below, if you require a link to the work used in the book tell me. It is listed in date order and is close to the bottom. In terms of any kind of reference that they use my work this seems to be what you get. It is on the list of publications used by the EU as a resource for the Euro. It has influenced the pension policy in the United Kingdom where pension saving alterations are now used to achieve economic targets. Since this has been applied the economic targets have been adhered to like straight lines on a graph, this is unprecedented. https://www.eui.eu/Research/Library/ResearchGuides/Economics/Eurozone
I am not pretending to be anyone, that is who I am. I post here to increase the hit rate to increase the value of the forum, I like to support it and to share the up to date macroeconomic work that is being used by the UK government and the EU. I feel I am being honest and generous to you by providing you with the advancements in macroeconomic policy that are being used. I also feel I support the website by starting threads and discussions that generate lots of hits, this makes it more valuable. I have given you access to free articles, books, correspondence with government ministers, news of macroeconomic advancements and many other resources to help keep you informed and support the forum through the availability of resources that create an interest for people to post here.