I will post it. I will have to wait until EOD probably. it is good to be off the highs the market has less laterals and you get to see more of the non failsafe EE's. as the day starts there is a degapped long RTL to put up. on the 30 minute channels sentiment and opening trade are both long
Can't you follow Uncle Creepy on his own threads? Or is it always necessary to hijack someone else's? Just wondering.
It might be more helpful if you post tomorrowâs chart today, Jack. In the I am getting my butt handed to me on a daily basis! thread, you outlined several agenda items. Unfortunately, that thread lost momentum before some of the topics were covered. Would consider revisiting that thread and addressing the DOM walls, games, and cascading items? -river
Are you posting to hijack this thread?? it looks like it. your whing is okay there are many many whiners on ET they do not whine in one thread; they whine in ALL threads
here is the first of the charts. It is the 5 minute Time Frame which contains three fractals. This is how bar by bar trading is done. Each bar contributes to the forming trend. trends have two ends and one middle. Aftr the beginning end is in place, then and only then does the middle begin to form. At some bar the second end appears. this is where the profit segment of the entire trend is taken. As has been stated this is too complex for most to handle. To handle the complexity of taking the full offer of a market, a person has to know that he knows at all times. Hence bar by bar analysis is used in a completely fefined system of the operation of the market. As most belief this comment is just gibberish to the majority of persons who do not have the capability to trade in a sysemmatic manner. How could it be any other way?
This is the second attachment for the dya (1/14/14). Two TF panes are shown. On the left is the slower Time Frame (TF). the geometry of the market is shown using a parallelogram rule set. Ends of trends are labelled with ftt which is the geometric definition of a trend ending. ftt's serve to both begin and end overlapping trend segments. trends overlap as a consequence of the fact that all trends end WITHIN the given trend Overlap is obvious. Its deduction is obvious as well. By coupling the bar context definition of trends with the geometric rule set, then the graphic process is failsafe. This charts demonstrate this rarely addressed facet of graphic analysis. CW's OODA does not take graphic monitoring and analysis into consideration at aall since it is a betting and risk appraoch Trend following does not work. graphic analysis requires that the user follow precision rules. Support and resistance does not work since no rule set is possible. S and R are jusr adjuncts to the gambling betting of CW and it's routine OODA.
Hey Jack, How about we open a production account at IB (preferably), paper trader, or even a C2 account and run a quarterly contest? Highest return wins x? $5K or $10K to the winner? First to hit a 10% marked draw-down loses, but if neither hits then highest return wins. I'll even allow you access to my account when we're done. You're such a baller and all... I'd think you'd jump at the chance to increase your AUM by $10%.