You are more likely to become a top Hollywood actor or popstar than profitable trader

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by crgarcia, Jun 3, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. I mentioned the terms very clearly, so dont fool around and pretend I was not crystal clear. I mentioned that for you I would lower it to 7 years track record with an annualized 20% return over the 7 years observation period. If you still show interest then go ahead and PM me, nothing of what I said changed.

     
    #81     Jun 5, 2010
  2. no I wont because out of 100 monkeys tossing darts at a paper , fully leveraged, and repeating the same game for 2 months, one monkey generates 1000% return. So what. I asked you for your long-term track record, so I would appreciate if you dont bs around with some wild bets that you felt urged to undertake. 7 years track record, annualized 20% return , excluding all capital infusions or withdrawals during that period. Very simple.

     
    #82     Jun 5, 2010
  3. well, let it suffice to say that we clearly did not attend a similar type of school otherwise you would not have to challenge everyone her for bets like a crazy gunslinger while switching from a long-term track record challenge to all kinds of other short-term casino bs.


     
    #83     Jun 5, 2010
  4. You didn't mention the terms, you failed to specify an amount you'd be willing to wager. Let me know how much you are willing to bet.
     
    #84     Jun 5, 2010
  5. please read clearly what I wrote. I did mention it. You should really focus on your own skills rather than ask others about their education.

     
    #85     Jun 5, 2010
  6. Sorry, I've read your posts and didn't see you offer any specific sum of money. All I can see is:

    "for someone daytrading over 10 years with a consistent positive track record I am willing to bet a lot against. Take me up on the offer one post above."

    Perhaps you could define "a lot" in terms of specific dollar amounts (your minimum and maximum $ you'd be willing to bet)?
     
    #86     Jun 5, 2010
  7. I never said I bet any money. I said "please read carefully what I offered", i detailed everything in the post right above the one you cited. Please do not expect anyone to bid money for your track record, how much cheaper can you get?


     
    #87     Jun 5, 2010
  8. What a loser... Asiaprick talks big and says he is willing to bet a lot of money, then when confronted with someone who is willing to take him on, he says "I never said I bet any money"

    lol

    g
     
    #88     Jun 5, 2010
  9. Read the post you moron, I never mentioned "money", I clearly mentioned what is on offer. How many more idiots are on this site? Seriously, how much clearer could I have been in my previous post???

    And Ghost.....did not even qualify as he did not seem to have a 10 year record, I later on offered to lower it to 7 years. So dont tell me I am the one who backed away, LOSER!

     
    #89     Jun 5, 2010
  10. luxor

    luxor

    Very entertaining thread. In all fairness, asiaprop didn't say he'd bet money. He said:

    "I take that risk, PM me, I even pay for your first class airline ticket and hotel to the city in Asia I live. You made the offer, I publicly invite you.

    P.S.: This offer applies to anyone with a 20%+ annual return track record over 10 years who wants to take a free vacation in one of the coolest cities in the world."is

    So maybe the simplest thing to do is this:

    asiaprop, calculate how much a first-class airline ticket and hotel in Asia would cost, and put the money in an escrow account (www.escrow.com) in care of a third party like Baron the moderator.

    Ghost, send asiaprop and Baron the statements (make sure you blot out any private info with a black marker)

    If the statements are legit, and asiaprop's conditions are fulfilled, the money is released to Ghost. If not, the money goes back to asiaprop.

    And if Ghost wins, he can always use the money to go visit asiaprop!
     
    #90     Jun 5, 2010
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.