Yoohoo's guide to becoming a great trader

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by yoohoo, Nov 19, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. YOU are the coward here...you were simply asked to provide what you considered did work and you completely ignored the request, but instead you chose to deflect the issue by challenging the OP to do something that ,in turn, you will not have the guts to do....

    Conclusion, YOU are scared of trading or to be seen to be wrong...hope there are no mirrors in your house, because you would be looking at a sorry sight.

    I personally respected a lot of what you do at this site, but when it comes to your trading prowess...you are hollow...

    Have a nice Thanksgiving and don't try to trade the turkey:eek:
     
    #81     Nov 24, 2009
  2. I was not suggesting cutting off the thread -- just not responding to insanity.


     
    #82     Nov 24, 2009
  3. TZ, if you could trade you'd do it here and now on ET. You are nothing more than a cheap scoundrel pretending to know what works and what doesn't work, but when asked to show one trade, just one, only one wee live trade, you get into a flap and post giant bold letters squirming out of it.

    If TA doesn't work as you claim, then you can prove me wrong and you as right straight away. How can you lose with me using TA?

    You're a chicken posing as a trader when you can't place a trade. You make thousands of posts as a know it all but when the chips are down you're a runner.

    When you can trade, you'll know something of what works and what doesn't and respect those who trade with a different style. You will also recognize a bluffer like you a million miles away and be prepared at the drop of a hat to expose them.

    If you decide to take up my challenge and save some face I'll be waiting for you buddy :)
     
    #83     Nov 24, 2009
  4. themickey

    themickey

    I have to agree with yoohoo.
    TZ has a long history of confronting other traders with comments such as " Post your blotter" but always runs like a hare when others ask him to show his skill.
    TZ loves to challenge others but hates being challenged himself.

    TZ = BLOWHARD = EMPTY VESSEL
     
    #84     Nov 24, 2009
  5. Yes, I did not read your comment as trying to cut off the thread at all.

    There are lots of threads, and one man's madness might be another man's method (hence the phrase "a method to the madness").

    I believe (hope?) that anyone that reads through any thread starts with "Caveat Emptor" in mind.

    And then decides for themselves if what they read makes sense to them personally, or not.
     
    #85     Nov 24, 2009
  6. EVERYONE on ET who is requested what "does work" ignores the request. You can't have been here that long and not know that no real trader here reveals their edge.

    To disprove this, provide a number of threads with verified (longterm audited or verifiable broker statements with good trading statsitics)

    But what does NOT work is available in spades
     
    #86     Nov 24, 2009
  7. stop hiding behind aliases. Show posts that say "post your blotter" - blotters are useless
     
    #87     Nov 24, 2009
  8. As soon as your 6 months of audited proof with decent trading stats that demonstrate YOUR claims here, I will follow.

    That is about the 3rd time you ran away from YOUR claims

    Your temper tantrums, whining and avoiding backing your own thread is having no effect.

    You are highlighting, bolding and underlining that you are avoiding being audited at all costs, but want people to read the following:

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=183183&perpage=40&pagenumber=1
     
    #88     Nov 24, 2009
  9. themickey

    themickey

    To disprove us doubters that you are just a blowhard always pointing the finger at others shortcomings, firstly, you post one live call as yoohoo suggests.
    What can be simpler than that?
     
    #89     Nov 24, 2009
  10. themickey

    themickey

    I have no alias. Mods, please confirm!
     
    #90     Nov 24, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.