The 'experiment' proved that HE cant make 100% on demand every month, not without a very high risk of ruin. You should make the correct conclusion and not generalize. But there is also till now no proof that it is possible, although it is not excluded.
OP , I suggest you discontinue this strategy and open a new strategy,then you can start from scratch。 Upgrade your plan to basic plan and reset your strategy. Trade only one contract at a time. With current 60% drawdown there hardly anyone to subscribe your strategy even if you make high monthly return. If you want subscribers, keep your drwadown low, this is the most important thing at C2.
Can you see it? I thought it was set to Private, thus nobody can see it anymore, unless maybe subscribers. Although if the system is on your Watchlist, it still shows the chart's little avatar, so if not completely correctly, one still can have a look at the performance. Anyhow, I was rooting for OP, but the experience didn't even last a month, and the market wasn't even volatile.
Does C2 allow cut and paste? Anyway, hats off to the OP for putting themselves out there for others to see losses. That's one of the first steps towards success. Being able to open up and not be ashamed of losses.
It doesn't matter, if one can see it, one can discuss it. Or take screen shots. I am not sure if when a system becomes Private, the system still can have subscribers or not.
Don't forget it was paper trading, he's not putting any real losses out there for others to see. Compare this journal to say Neke's long running journal, neke showed much bigger losses. So not sure if the OP needs much in the way of a hats off. He just proved that the results previously posted on this thread were BS by not being able to reproduce them on C2. But we knew that was going to happen. The whole exercise was for vending purposes as well.
Yes, but for a while you could see it when on C2. --Everyone knows that the posting in this journaling was faux.