Yes it seems reasonable. But what we really want to happen with this type of trading is for brackets to get activated. But in a gap nothing can get activated, so it is gambling if you leave the position open. Also large gaps can cause some future technical problems if the gap takes us over a level. So yes, If everybody would like this journal to track this exiting on Fridays so be it. Silence means yes, and comments will be considered. Assuming silence, this will begin next Friday 05/14/04. Michael B. P.S. I am playing on Forex with this tonight using Oanda's free charts lol.
Sure it is pivots: GEOMETRICAL PIVOTS The formula you are using is not exactly cama but it is very close: try the other one. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=26130&perpage=6&pagenumber=8
I have an archive of almost one year every day of my model and all the accessories around ... like geometrical pivots . I don't trade cama only my model - which has nothing to do with such simplistic pivots - I just look at them as well as I look at fib ratios to have a quick glance since it is simplistic but like any other pivots or fibonacci based system they are blind: like the other day my model knows why 10177 was due BEFORE it was printed on pivots only after the fact . http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=27723&perpage=6&pagenumber=9 So I can't give any real suggestion to cama alone as it would relate to my model.