YM in a Can

Discussion in 'Journals' started by ElectricSavant, May 3, 2004.

  1. New short reversal brackets at 10013, 9923.


    Looks Like this:


    10013 S (H3)
    9953 L Entry***
    9923 S (L4)



    Michael B.

    ***Step 3 Position Size Management
     
    #191     May 14, 2004
  2. reverse Long brackets 10043, 9953

    Looks like this:

    10043 L (H4)
    10013 S Entry
    9953 L (L3)

    Michael B.
     
    #192     May 14, 2004
  3. Short reversal brackets 10013, 9923

    Looks Like this:

    10013 S (H3)
    9953 L Entry
    9923 S (L4)

    Michael B.
     
    #193     May 14, 2004
  4. It seems the 1/2 bracket rule is not used consistently (in order to control risks?). :confused:
     
    #194     May 14, 2004
  5. Please explain?

    :)

    Michael B.

     
    #195     May 14, 2004
  6. It seems both the two trades were made after having (-30 YM points/contract). :confused:
     
    #196     May 14, 2004
  7. I don't understand have I missed a trade, what is your point? Sorry I am so stupid?

    Michael B.

    P.S. All we need is Position Size Management on a breakeven system...what is it you do not understand about this?

    P.S.S. The size of the losses are smaller than the size of the profits (risk reward). This is why the Position Size Mangement can endure more steps. As far as half bracket, the target side of it will be complete at the switch to the new session, at least there is always a stop in place!

     
    #197     May 14, 2004
  8. Actually I'm still in the process of studying your method (without downloading your files :D !), and that's why asking the question.

    In other words, for the trades #32 and #33, why 1/2 bracket was used with only #32 (but both are losing trades by 30 points, aren't they?)? :confused:
     
    #198     May 14, 2004
  9. reversal brackets at 10043, 9953


    Looks like this:

    10043 L (H4)
    10013 S Entry
    9953 L (L3)


    Michael B.
     
    #199     May 14, 2004
  10. When your reply and post they alway have a "frowning face avatar with a worried look" which detracts from your meaning.

    Please remove that, I have noted that everone of your posts have this.

    Michael B.
     
    #200     May 14, 2004