I found out quite quickly that not many ET folks can read statements. I posted the open for three days. I showed the opening entry and first reversal. In the last print, there was only an increase of 13K from the prior Friday's sweep two days into the next week. I was showing opening trades aand I sidelined the rest of the two days. Perkelo could not read that comish is taken out immediately. What a turd he was in his snide misunderstand of the print. Finally, your comments are as bad as Perkelo's.
you may wish to try to name just one. Certainly, I will delete anyone immediately if that were possible.
I have turned down CNBC four times as well. ET is different, though. Take your dad on cruises and to far away places. As I have mentioned, reading is not how trading is learned. Elsewhere there is an active thread for becoming expert. Your approach to learning is misguided. Maybe your dad can coach you on how neurology aand the attendant perception concerns work. Find someone to help you take the first steps in learning anything.
My comments are accurate. They're bad in the sense that you don't approve of being called a scammer. You were caught lying about fills (price didn't touch) and you still lost money on the calls. You trade $110k of OPM. I don't think anything else needs to be stated.
Really? Why on earth would CNBC invite you to appear on TV? Who are you? Did you write an article in the Wall Street Journal, Barron's or Investor's Business Daily? Did you get published in Stocks and Commodities Magazine? Futures Magazine? Did you write a trading book and it's now a best seller on Amazon ? Are you a well known public speaker in the financial community? Did you win a trading contest? Do you own or manage a successful and well-known hedge fund with a documented and audited track record? Do you have a trading website that attracts tons of traffic? I mean what have you ever officially accomplished that would prompt CNBC officials to contact you and beg for a live TV interview... not once but four times?