1. I referred to killings generally in the quote he referred to, not just the camps. 2. One person doesn't make a pattern.
The pictures are representative .....Pure Elitism. Old money, Harvard, well connected , WASP, Mayflower, DAR Do be dumb about what the pictures represent. Its the original White power globalist...My Gosh ...they even created the UN to manage this
Are you saying that this Elite society never existed Elitism is the belief or notion that individuals who form an elite—a select group of people perceived as having an intrinsic quality, high intellect, wealth, power, notability, special skills, or experience—are more likely to be constructive to society as a whole, and therefore deserve influence or authority greater than that of others.[1] The term elitism may be used to describe a situation in which power is concentrated in the hands of a limited number of people. Attributes that identify an elite vary; personal achievement may not be essential. Elite status can be based on personal achievement, such as degrees from top-rate universities or impressive internships and job offers, as well as on lineage or passed-on fame from parents or grandparents.[citation needed] As a term, "elite" usually describes a person or group of people who are members of the uppermost class of society, and wealth can contribute to that class determination Some synonyms for "elite" might be "upper-class" or "aristocratic", indicating that the individual in question has a relatively large degree of control over a society's means of production. This includes those who gain this position due to socioeconomic means and not personal achievement.
How complicated can it be. You made an assertion. I asked for your source. You haven't provided it. Dumbed down: You did not just assert that your society existed; and I never said it didn't. I'm not going to play dumb with you. At least I hope you're playing. You can provide a source, or not.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...d-elites-are-no-strangers-to-white-supremacy/ To help you with context....The KKK were Democrats But white supremacists of old were, in fact, the very same “suit-and-tie version.” In her 2015 book, “Ku-Klux: The Birth of the Klan During Reconstruction,” Elaine Frantz Parsons argues that “the men who first became Ku-Klux — Frank O. McCord, Richard Reed, John C. Lester, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, and James Crowe — presented themselves as elites and intellectuals, above and opposed to the violence of rough men.” These were the well-educated elites of their day. Many founders of the Klan were property owners and most had assets exceeding $10,000. Two were attorneys and one was a real estate broker. One member, John Kennedy, had recently inherited $20,000 from his father, a figure equivalent to at least $500,000 today. Many were widely read and at least half had taken college classes. Try this and learn then try to discuss the points
Stating that the elites are no strangers to white supremacy does not support your contention that the elites are responsible for the lying, hating, and killings by Whites throughout history. Keep googling.