You really should go back and read the posts on this thread. I provided clear links to articles outlining the facts I stated. Running stuff through a biased AI instance which spews out bullshiat is laughable. And demonstrates you are incapable of thinking for yourself or properly addressing proven facts. Reality eludes you.
Well islam killing more people will be your slanted pro Jewish opinion which I disagree with. What I do agree, Islam which follows many similarities to Judaism in religion is also genocidal.
I’ve also responded to this. Please go back and read my earlier posts where I dismantle the foundational assumptions of your position. Thoroughly. With sources. Thanks.
1900-2024, Christian wars have killed 110 - 130 million. Muslims, a paltry 15-20 million in the same time period. Many who use “Islam = violence” rhetoric rely on asymmetrical logic, where: Muslim = collective guilt, always. Christian/Western = individual anomaly, or unfortunate history. So if we're flattening nuance, the “scorecard” doesn’t look great for Christianity.
Spouting nonsense out of a customized twisted AI instance is not "responding". Go educate yourself and read my earlier posts where the facts are provided. Bottom line: This conflict in Gaza will not end until Hamas is eliminated as a governing and militant entity in Gaza. This will allow another entity to take over the administration of Gaza. Hamas can exist underground but they will no longer be a ruling or large-scaled armed entity in Gaza. If Hamas does not step out of being a governing and militant entity in Gaza either willingly or via force -- then we will all be in our 80s decades from now discussing this topic on ET.
Many who use “Islam = violence” rhetoric rely on asymmetrical logic, where: Muslim = collective guilt, always. Christian/Western = individual anomaly, or unfortunate history. So if we're flattening nuance, the “scorecard” doesn’t look great for Christianity.
You’ve invented a new form of argument: the “self-citation.” “All my previous posts are true and relevant, because I wrote them.” As for AI.. if you think GPT is “twisted” because it doesn’t agree with you, that says more about your priors than its bias. You’re welcome to disagree, but maybe try responding to points instead of just shouting “go read my thread” like a bald, horribly dressed prophet.
Links were provided to articles with details in nearly all of my posts. The posts cite and link to facts. Facts are something you have trouble with when you play with your customized AI instance. Anyone can create a customized AI instance which does not cite reality, sets environment constraints so it babbles bullshiat or train it to the point where it is devoid of sensibility.
You link to all sorts of shite and don't ever read half of them yourself. What am I going to have for my tea? I baked bread today.. Maybe spicy baked beans on toast? Oh and @gwb-trading CGPT which needs no mortal food said: "You can't claim the moral high ground by redefining global-scale wars as not Christian while attributing every conflict involving Muslims to Islam. Either we apply nuance to both, or none at all. Your approach is a textbook example of special pleading."