Yeah right..... Currently Palestinians are trapped in Gaza, no escape while Israel bombs the living crap out of them with Biden bombs. What's FOOL biden doing? Why - oh just supplying more bombs while talking out both sides of his mouth about peace. So Biden's plan of trapping Palestinians while sitting on his hands and supply evil Netanyahu with more killing mechanisms is better than Trumps plan of at least letting them escape this hell on earth which biden endorses. Whatever, the Palestinians are fucked! They have religious neighbours from hell who's sole aim is to steal land from Palestine at the point of a gun while America endorses it. The only best solution in my opinion, let Palestinians escape because they are totally snookered. In the meantime, let Israel steal land, their day of reckoning is coming, the rest of the Arab neighbours along with Russia, China, North Korea will not leave them live in peace. Israel is fucked too, and they deserve it. Their mythological god will not save them. Let America get sucked into the fray, more religious nutters, who will blame the devil when evil arrives back on their doorstep.
Christians and Jewish religion. The bible talking about itself: “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
America and Israel (christianity / judaism) with weapons mentality is anything but love... Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away.
More information and detail... Top UN court says Israel’s presence in occupied Palestinian territories is illegal and should end https://apnews.com/article/icj-cour...-settlements-2d5178500c0410341b252335859f2316 THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — The top U.N. court said Friday that Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is “unlawful” and called on it to end and for settlement construction to stop immediately, issuing an unprecedented, sweeping condemnation of Israel’s rule over the lands it captured 57 years ago. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly denounced the nonbinding opinion issued by the 15-judge panel of the International Court of Justice, saying the territories are part of the Jewish people’s historic “homeland.” But the resounding breadth of the decision could impact international opinion and fuel moves for unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state. The judges pointed to a wide list of policies, including the building and expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, use of the area’s natural resources, the annexation and imposition of permanent control over lands and discriminatory policies against Palestinians, all of which it said violated international law. The court said Israel had no right to sovereignty in the territories, was violating international laws against acquiring territory by force and was impeding Palestinians’ right to self-determination. It said other nations were obliged not to “render aid or assistance in maintaining” Israel’s presence in the territories. It said Israel must end settlement construction immediately and that existing settlements must be removed, according to a summary of the more than 80-page opinion read out by court President Nawaf Salam. Israel’s “abuse of its status as the occupying power” renders its “presence in the occupied Palestinian territory unlawful,” the court said, saying its presence must be ended as “rapidly as possible.” The court’s opinion, sought by the U.N. General Assembly after a Palestinian request, came against the backdrop of Israel’s devastating military assault on Gaza, which was triggered by the Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7. In a separate case, the International Court of Justice is considering a South African claim that Israel’s campaign in Gaza amounts to genocide, a claim that Israel vehemently denies. The court said the General Assembly and Security Council — where staunch Israeli ally the United States holds a veto — should consider “the precise modalities” to end Israel’s presence in the territories. Israel, which normally considers the United Nations and international tribunals as unfair and biased, didn’t send a legal team to the hearings. Instead, it submitted written comments, saying that the questions put to the court are prejudiced and fail to address Israeli security concerns. Israeli officials have said the court’s intervention could undermine the peace process, which has been stagnant for more than a decade. “The Jewish people are not conquerors in their own land — not in our eternal capital Jerusalem and not in the land of our ancestors in Judea and Samaria,” Netanyahu said in a statement issued by his office, using the biblical terms for the West Bank. “No false decision in The Hague will distort this historical truth and likewise the legality of Israeli settlement in all the territories of our homeland cannot be contested.” Speaking outside the court, Riad Malki, an adviser to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, called the opinion “a watershed moment for Palestine, for justice and for international law.” He said other nations must now “uphold the clear obligations” outlined by the court. “No actions of any kind ... to support Israel’s illegal occupation.” Hamas welcomed the court’s decision and said in a statement that “serious steps on the ground” need to be taken in response. Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians seek all three areas for an independent state. Israel considers the West Bank to be disputed territory, whose future should be decided in negotiations, while it has moved populations there in settlements to solidify its hold. It has annexed east Jerusalem in a move that isn’t internationally recognized, while it withdrew from Gaza in 2005 but maintained a blockade of the territory after Hamas took power in 2007. The international community generally considers all three areas to be occupied territory. The court’s decision strikes at the heart of the ambiguity of Israel’s administration of the territories. Israel hasn’t annexed the West Bank — though settler groups have pressed it to do so — but it calls it part of its homeland and has effectively treated it as an extension of the nation. Along with the settlements, it has appropriated large swaths of the territory as “state lands.” At the same time, Netanyahu’s government has repeatedly rejected the creation of any Palestinian state. Abbas’ Palestinian Authority has been restricted to control over divided enclaves scattered around the West Bank. The Palestinians presented arguments at hearings in February, along with 49 other nations and three international organizations. In the hearings, Malki accused Israel of apartheid and urged the United Nations’ top court to declare that Israel’s occupation of lands sought by the Palestinians is illegal and must end immediately and unconditionally for any hope for a two-state future to survive. Erwin van Veen, a senior research fellow at the Clingendael think tank in The Hague, said before the decision that a ruling that Israel’s policies breach international law would “isolate Israel further internationally, at least from a legal point of view.” He said such a ruling would remove “any kind of legal, political, philosophical underpinning of the Israeli expansion project.” It could also increase the number of countries that recognize a Palestinian state, in particular in the Western world, following the recent example of Spain and Norway and Ireland, he said. It’s not the first time the ICJ has been asked to give its legal opinion on Israeli policies. Two decades ago, the court ruled that Israel’s West Bank separation barrier was “contrary to international law.” Israel boycotted those proceedings, saying they were politically motivated. Israel says the barrier is a security measure. Palestinians say the structure amounts to a massive land grab, because it frequently dips into the West Bank. The court said that Israel’s construction of settlements in the West Bank violated international laws prohibiting countries from moving their population into territories they occupy. Israel has built well over 100 settlements, according to the anti-settlement monitoring group Peace Now. The West Bank settler population has grown by more than 15% in the past five years to more than 500,000 Israelis, according to a pro-settler group. Their residents are Israeli citizens governed by domestic law and served by government ministries, services, banks and other businesses — effectively integrating them into Israel. Israel also has annexed east Jerusalem and considers the entire city to be its capital. An additional 200,000 Israelis live in settlements built in east Jerusalem that Israel considers to be neighborhoods of its capital. Palestinian residents of the city face systematic discrimination, making it difficult for them to build new homes or expand existing ones. The international community considers all settlements to be illegal or obstacles to peace since they are built on lands sought by the Palestinians for their state. Netanyahu’s hard-line government is dominated by settlers and their political supporters. Netanyahu has given his finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, a former settler leader, unprecedented authority over settlement policy. Smotrich has used this position to cement Israel’s control over the West Bank by pushing forward plans to build more settlement homes and to legalize outposts.
The Torah and Bible are ficticious writings. The Jews wholeheartedly believe these ficticious writings. Jews and christians believe Jews are entitled to takeover land because "God said so". Doesn't matter what anyone says or does, Israel is hellbent on having its own way because of obstinate false beliefs. If Israel were to take all Palestinan land, that would not be the end of it, like Russia they want more and shitstirring is in their indoctrinated DNA.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken on the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal: "We're inside the 10-yard line". He didn't say which end of the field, though. 'We're inside the 10-yard line': Secretary of State on an Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal NPR - https://tinyurl.com/5e68et8c
July 19, 2024 Why a second Trump presidency could be bad for Israel His approach has had a tendency for isolation (Getty) Written By: Limor Simhony Philpott https://thespectator.com/topic/second-trump-presidency-bad-israel/ If Donald Trump becomes president again — which seems likely — American policy towards Israel could see a dramatic shift. Since the war between Israel and Hamas started last October, Trump has repeatedly expressed his support for Israel. The head of the Republican Jewish Coalition claimed that Trump would grant Israel “a blank check” to finish off Hamas. Trump also warned that if Hamas doesn’t release the hostages, they’ll “pay a big price” if he becomes president. Many Israelis, including those in government, assume that a Trump/Vance win would be beneficial for Israel. A closer look shows that it may not necessarily be so. When the war against Hamas started, president Joe Biden sent considerable American forces to the region. When Iran struck in April, by firing hundreds of missiles and drones against Israel, American forces played a pivotal role in protecting Israel. American forces routinely intercept missiles launched by the Houthis too. Biden also oversaw the supply of massive, continuous shipments of weapons and vital equipment to Israel during the war, as well as a very generous aid package. Would Trump have acted similarly? Perhaps. But Trump’s approach has had a tendency for isolation. His chaotic — often impulsive — foreign policy legacy includes withdrawing from international agreements and forcing worse terms on smaller member states. Trump may choose to avoid making long-term strategic commitments, and instead push Israel to rely on building partnerships with regional countries for running and rebuilding Gaza after the war and dealing with the Iranian threat. If Israel does collaborate with Middle Eastern partners, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, American involvement will still needed to bring together old enemies in a successful collaboration. Stopping Qatari and Iranian funding of terrorism in the Middle East and beyond, as well as preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons, would also be much more effective with American involvement. However, Trump isn’t a traditional isolationist. He’ll keep pursuing international involvement if he believes that it serves American interests, as well as his own. He would love to be hailed as the person who not only ended the war in Gaza but who also brokered a peace deal between Israel and a Palestinian leadership. Although Netanyahu and Trump enjoyed a good relationship in the past, relations have soured after Netanyahu congratulated Biden on his win in 2020. Trump referred to Netanyahu as a “loser,” accused him of “betrayal” and criticized his handling of the war. Trump has openly said that others within Israeli politics are better suited to lead the country. He also argued that Netanyahu has no intention of making peace with the Palestinians. Netanyahu is currently trying to repair relations with Trump, but a deep lack of trust and respect will make this difficult. Trump doesn’t have Biden’s long term commitment to the Jewish state. His is a far more utilitarian stance. Therefore, in trying to force a (so far) defiant Netanyahu into a ceasefire deal with Hamas, Trump may place greater pressure on Netanyahu than Biden has — and will be more likely to act on his threats. Israelis who support Trump should also remember that although the former president was quick to point the finger at Biden’s Iran policy as the reason behind Hamas’s October 7 attack, it was his own withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear agreement (pushed by Netanyahu’s short-sighted advice) that has resulted in Iran getting much closer to having the bomb. Although it was a bad deal to begin with, withdrawing from it has made matters worse. Trump and Vance’s help to Israel may be more limited Trump’s choice for vice president, J.D. Vance, should particularly worry Israel. Although the devout Christian has much sympathy for Israel, Vance is a true “America First” isolationist. His approach means that any American intervention must be done only to the extent that it serves narrow American interests. He would be reluctant to risk involving American forces in wars in the Middle East. Vance has also objected to the American aid package to Israel and Ukraine that included $4 billion to replenish Israel’s depleted missile defense systems. Although his main objection was aid to Ukraine, he was willing to sacrifice critical aid to Israel to get his way. Trump and Vance’s help to Israel may therefore be more limited. Hallowed threats will not help Israel fight enemies that seek to destroy it. Withdrawal of forces and a lack to true commitment to defend Israel could embolden its rivals. A new American leadership will require new strategic thinking from Israel. Israelis are rightfully worried that Joe Biden isn’t fit to be president — and he may indeed choose to step aside. But Trump isn’t the better option. This article was originally published on The Spectator’s UK website.
J.D. Vance a devout Christian..... Guns, christians, fear and paranoia, that's what defines America. Should Trump win, there'll be one more definition to add: Confusion. The devil will play a prominent role - getting the blame for all the ensuing fuckups.