Wow! Another racial fight.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Maverick74, Apr 22, 2011.

  1. Hello

    Hello

    Bingo! I dont care whether the criminals are white, black, brown, mexican, asian, or whatever. We need to quit subsidizing their behaviour. We have already proven time and time again that we are not going to change the ghetto behaviour by this underclass of people by giving them more money. So the best option is to starve them, quit funding welfare, section 8 housing, etc. It has never worked, and infact all it has done is create more and more criminals, because a mom is free to sit at home have 8 children and not raise any of them, with no money to feed them but the money she gets from honest hard working peoples taxes. For the children from these areas who work real hard and do well in school give them an education, and they will leave the ghettos they grew up in.

    If the government could really solve any problems by throwing enough money at it, there wouldnt be a single criminal in our society. The liberal idea of subsidizing bad beahviour is clearly a failed experiment, and i dont understand how they thought it was going to end up. Somehow Liberals think that rewarding bad behaviour is going to change it, it would be like giving my dog a treat when he pisses on my carpet and wondering why he wont quit pissing all over my carpet.

    I say Starve the vermin let them suffer the consequences of their own behaviour, and god willing they will wipe themselves out, or else they will come to the realisation that they have to change their behaviour in order to survive in society.
     
    #241     Apr 24, 2011
  2. Savant

    Savant

    But the thing is, if you just quit funding them, they can still keep victimizing you. They likely WILL keep victimizing you out of resentment. I agree with regard to that suggestion, but is that really enough? We also need to be able to protect ourselves from the slaughter. Ending the racial discrimination programs would help too. That has a very high collateral cost, I think. I think if you can't get admitted to the college on the basis of your grades, or get the job based on your merit, too bad. I also don't think that a person deserves more funding for their education, just based on their race.
     
    #242     Apr 24, 2011
  3. Hello

    Hello

    If nothing else, if we quit giving them foodstamps, and welfare, it will atleast slow down the number of kids they are having. When a kid ends up being an extra mouth to feed as opposed to extra money from the government, they will be a lot less inclined to keep pumping out more babies, who they cant afford to raise, who inevitably grow up to be criminals.

    Another thing we could do is force anyone who lives on welfare for more then 12 months to have a vasectomy, or have their tubes tied, if they do it without subsequently finding a job, and paying atleast enough in taxes to make up for the welfare.

    We need to atleast slow down birthrates by these people who contribute nothing to society, so that we dont end up exponentially having to pay for, or be victimised by more and more of them.

     
    #243     Apr 24, 2011
  4. Savant

    Savant

    Uh oh, looks like Mohamed Ali was a racist too!

    <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HqiWFLsgVi4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    #244     Apr 24, 2011
  5. Crazy. That's all I can say. If the hood is two streets over, then someone overpaid for their property.

    Edit.
    Atlanta, which is my home, is not built that way. Marietta is quite a drive from Cambellton Road. Not that Marietta is that good anymore. Maybe I should have used Alpharetta, but that is ground zero for the subprime crisis. So it is hard to say now.
     
    #245     Apr 25, 2011
  6. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    #246     Apr 25, 2011
  7. Ricter

    Ricter

    That was my first question when I saw this thread and video come up, "how do we know it's racially motivated?" But I'm tired of asking the same, obvious questions in thread after thread.
     
    #247     Apr 25, 2011
  8. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    I never said it was racially motivated. Although it's being investigated as a possible racial hate crime. Do you really think these goons attacked her because she was a transgender or because they were looking for a fight? I was appalled by the attack Ricter, not the race.
     
    #248     Apr 25, 2011
  9. Maverick74

    Maverick74

  10. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    #250     Apr 25, 2011