Would you support a militairy coup in the US?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Debaser82, Feb 25, 2010.

Would you?

  1. 100%

    13 vote(s)
    31.7%
  2. Never ever

    24 vote(s)
    58.5%
  3. Screw the US

    4 vote(s)
    9.8%
  1. Well I can admit when I'm wrong, it happens to everyone, athough most never own up. BTW why are u participating in this thread when u don't live in the US?
     
    #71     Feb 26, 2010
  2. If there was an equivalent site in Canada, that's where I'd likely be. In any event, I trade a US market. Thanks for asking.
     
    #72     Feb 26, 2010
  3. LOL. But why the hell would the teabaggers support this? I'm saying if the President raised, or attempted to raise, a civilian army essentially, I would expect the rest of the nation to be alarmed as to why he would want such a thing.
     
    #73     Feb 26, 2010
  4. I didn't say this site, I said this thread, question dodger.
     
    #74     Feb 26, 2010
  5. My mistake. I just have an active BS detector independent of subject matter. Feel free to marvel at my international scope. :D
     
    #75     Feb 26, 2010
  6. Thing must go off constantly... cause you're full of shit :p

    See how it feels to get corny ass one lined. This is like 90% of your posts, and it is really douchy.
     
    #76     Feb 26, 2010
  7. Ricter

    Ricter

    Just do what some do and pretend Canada is the 51st state, and you'll feel better about Gab being here.
     
    #77     Feb 26, 2010
  8. This from the DoucheMaster General. :p

    Some posts require a considered response. Others are more deserving of a drive-by.
     
    #78     Feb 26, 2010
  9. There is substantial supportive evidence regarding the "civilian" forces.
    However I haven't seen any conjecture that fits well though these patterns
    of governmental controls are common in think tank planning.

    I am taking literary liberty here based on my experience and study on how these things
    take formation and will present some conjecture. Much of this scenario and precept can easily
    be confirmed with a minimal of research as previously mentioned.

    I suspect the reason for the 3 groups of "civilian" forces are as follows:


    Group #1:
    - Volunteers
    ----- Greeners or emergency preparedness liberal pabulum eaters.
    ----- Provides the administration with pre-qualified raw recruits to draw paid leadership from who are fully and easily indoctrinated and can indoctrinate others well.

    Group #2:
    - Compulsory 18-25 YO 3 Month service.
    ----- Provides the administration with pre-qualified raw recruits to draw paid leadership from who are fully and easily indoctrinated and can indoctrinate others well.
    ----- Creates an "economy" in a huge voting block that is indoctrinated
    and financially rewarded and can "Consume" and "Get Loans" for "Green" products ... especially "Green" Automobiles.
    ----- Provides the administration with Hegelian dialectic controls and social group in support of the administration in crisis driven "Change."

    Group #3:
    - Armed Civilian Group
    ----- Provides the administration with leadership who are fully indoctrinated and can enforce the administrations agendas directly.
    ----- Provides the administration with ready Hegelian dialectic controls and a standing army for for crisis driven "Change."
    Rahm Emanuel ... "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste" http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm


    These groups will be made up of or made into "True Believers."
    Their livelihoods, friendships and futures will be with their group and indoctrinated mindset and the administrations agendas.

    They will be convinced they are saving America and her way of life.
    They will be a managed economy and culture that reduces our unemployment rate and directly affects FED reporting.


    As ingenious as it is evil ... "The Plan" is.
     
    #79     Feb 26, 2010
  10. Unretired, does paranoid schizophrenia run in your family?
     
    #80     Feb 26, 2010