Would you leave your child alone with a same sex homosexual?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Clubber Lang, Apr 3, 2014.

Would you trust your child alone with a homosexual of the same sex?

  1. Yes- Homosexuals are great babysitters

    5 vote(s)
    27.8%
  2. No- I fear for my child's well being

    13 vote(s)
    72.2%
  1. Max E.

    Max E.

    If your going by the numbers, and you have a son, he has pretty much a zero percent chance of being molested if its not by a male, who would have to be a homosexual, if he was into little boys.
     
    #21     Apr 4, 2014
  2. Max E.

    Max E.

    You cant have children from anal sex, so you have nothing to worry about, besides getting aids from one of your shit packing buddies.
     
    #22     Apr 4, 2014
  3. .
     
    #23     Apr 4, 2014
  4. Ricter

    Ricter

    Naturally, if the unknowns are high, you're wiser to leave your kid, of either sex, with a female guardian.
     
    #24     Apr 4, 2014
  5. jem

    jem

    This is a tough subject because there is a fine line between vigilance and paranoia.
    But, as a father I have paid attention and done some research. A small percentage of all males are suspect. I think it is a mistake to leave any young kids alone with males. If you have to do it, its probably safer if you have watched them interact with their own children.

    If you follow the above rule you don't have to be aware of the fact that there are predators of all types out there and (the studies are limited but they are the net) that male on boy predators on average have far more victims each and that they are far more likely to be predators per capita.

    Also when taking you kids to ball fields, or church groups (not just catholic) or school activities watch out for the overly kid friendly people with the kids. Especially the ones who are not there as parents. When I have volunteered to teach kids I had to go through a quick training per the state of CA. The training rightfully stated no touching or hugging. Yet you see it. These people know they are not supposed to do it... so what does that mean. Percentage wise.
     
    #25     Apr 4, 2014
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    "When I have volunteered to teach kids I had to go through a quick training per the state of CA. The training rightfully stated no touching or hugging. Yet you see it. These people know they are not supposed to do it... so what does that mean. Percentage wise."

    To me that's one of the sadder developments of our time. We've nearly reached the point where grandpa can't let a kid sit on his lap.
     
    #26     Apr 4, 2014
  7. LOL. I have all the poo pumpers on ignore.

    Really helps to clean up the site and ignore the homo agenda of trying to convince the world that what they do is normal.
     
    #27     Apr 4, 2014
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    You appear to have an unusual fixation on this. Fueled by fear? Shame?
     
    #28     Apr 4, 2014
  9. jem

    jem

    yes it is a shame.. there are just some friendly little kids who want to give hugs... it is probably a bit tough on them when an adult keeps their distance... but what else can you do.

    I have noticed a high percentage of Catholic priests now keep to themselves during the kid activities. I suspect there is even a bit of a trend for them to have dogs. They seem to go off and walk their dogs. I am sure its just about the anti-thesis of the reason they became priests... but I suspect many of the good ones just don't want suspicious eyes cast upon them.


     
    #29     Apr 4, 2014
  10. Ricter

    Ricter

    That's too bad, too. Last I heard, the rate of pedophilia among the Catholic priest population is still lower than it is among the general population. Of course, any incidence of it in the former is way more controversial.
     
    #30     Apr 4, 2014