Would the US BomB a house with Americans kids in it, if not why would they bomb a hou

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mahram, Jun 14, 2006.

Are iraqi lives more expendable then american

  1. yes

    8 vote(s)
    80.0%
  2. no

    2 vote(s)
    20.0%
  1. You seem to be saying that dieing from a bombing is somehow more terrible than dieing from a bullet to the head, or being burned up in a fire bomb.

    Dead is dead.

    We are always G*ds most precious commodity.
     
    #11     Jun 14, 2006
  2. what about the tens of thousands of civilians, women, children, elderly, bombed to death throughout iraq, particularly baghdad? people that did nothing criminal at all, people who wouldn't know there was a chance of the us "blowing up their ass"?
     
    #12     Jun 14, 2006
  3. Honestly it's a no-brainer, the US (and any other country including Canada for that matter) would shoot down a hijacked commercial plane with american children aboard if the government had reasons to believe that the hijackers were going to crash it into a building, government organization, nuclear power plant etc. Similarly the government will bomb a house with American children if it's the only way to get rid of dangerous terrorists planning to kill tens of thousands of americans.

    Of course american kids have no reason to be in a house in Iraq, Gaza or another hostile area and if the house is in the US (or Canada) I am sure the military and the FBI can easily find much better ways to handle the situation and neutralize the terrorists without hurting the children.
     
    #13     Jun 15, 2006