yes, most ....um... almost all politicians are good little corporate puppets, WHICH IS EXACTLY MY POINT! al gore would have done what they told him to. just look at how he shills for the global warming "Tax Mafia."
Yes, of course. Big Al was just an innocent bystander. He had a smaller office than Hillary. At least he got to watch the important decisions being made.
LOL LOL LOL.. nick and i usually never agree on much but ZZZzzzz you have a way of uniting people. he pretty much nailed you zzzZZZ.... you have no comeback. for once just admit you are wrong and move on.
You are known by the company you keep, keep keeping on with the likes of nick... There is no evidence that Gore would have attacked Iraq to remove Saddam in 2003... In fact, Gore supported Dean, who was anti war... http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/09/elec04.prez.gore.dean/
So you admitting to having 14 screen names, voting 14 times? Being on the opposite side of the ET crowd suits me just fine...
Would Al Gore, having been apprised by not only the CIA but the other major intelligence agencies of the world that Saddam was developing WMD - combined with the fact that Saddam was not cooperating with weapons inspectors - have done the prudent thing and attacked Iraq? In other words, would he have protected the US public to his utmost ability based on the most accurate information he had at the time? Probably not. Gore would not have invaded since he might have lost a few of the popularity votes among the moonbats...America's safety be damned....the Zzztroll wins this one, fellas.