World's "most-quoted" Climatologist says carbon-dioxide-based global warming is Bunk

Discussion in 'Politics' started by wilburbear, May 6, 2007.

  1. jem

    jem



    you consistently misrepresent and misquote for the sake of harassment.

    You are a lowest from of troll - a troll without talent.
     
    #51     May 10, 2007
  2. maxpi

    maxpi

    You did not quote me on the part about all the planets warming. Why is that? This knowledge is from the hallowed left wing leaning halls of publically funded knowledge. It disproves the idea that our planet is warming due to the "evil virus" we lovingly call mankind. It tends to make Gores ideas look like a power grab and a money grab. What's wrong with a little scientific knowledge in this argument?
     
    #52     May 10, 2007
  3. man

    man

    sorry to hear about your suffering. nevertheless your arguments
    lack some depth. "CO2 is not a toxic chemical" is really weak. salt
    ain't toxic either, but don't try to eat a pound of it. and about your
    last parapgraph, well most of what you call facts here is in disagreement
    to majority of the scientific community. melting of ice caps on the
    poles can have devastating effects. and even if it was that we
    have tropical forests in greenland ... well if that happens at the
    expense of five katrinas a year and floods all over the planet ...
    quite some cost here.
     
    #53     May 11, 2007
  4. man

    man

    that popped up relatively recent and i have not seen a statement
    of the scientific community as of now. so i have to postpone that
    part of the answer. but i disagree that it makes Gore look like
    what you think he is. actually i guess al gore would be quite
    happy if his scenarios were untrue and we cooled again soon.
     
    #54     May 11, 2007
  5. man

    man

    you are mixing up things in such an obviously superficial way, that
    it is hard to answer, since you will come up with another such
    plain generalisation. nevertheless, i give it a try: comparing the
    efforts of thousands of people around the globe who deeply and
    honestly care about what is going on to a very specific situation
    where whoever protests for whatever reason against a wind
    turbine is ... unreasonable. at best.
     
    #55     May 11, 2007
  6. No, it's just that I found it hilarious that you would defend enviromentalists protesting a wind turbine.

    I guess that's to be expected. You should watch the Penn & Teller bullshit video on enviromentalists to give yourself a view on just how misguided a lot of these folks are.

    - signing petitions to outlaw dihygrogen monoxide - H2O - water, and all because they're all
    'caught up' in the giddyness of being with a bunch of other goofballs.

    - burning Hummers because they put out too much pollution. Prolly more pollution put out by the burning than the Hummer ever will.

    - burning houses under construction in Colorado and putting the surrounding forest at risk, all in the name of conserving the forest lands.

    - one of the heads of PETA using bovine insulin to control her diabetes, even though PETA is against the use of any animal byproducts or animal experimentation. SHe justifies her use because it allows her to carry on the fight for animals..

    It goes on and on. You sure that you want to defend ALL enviromentalists? Maybe you should pick your fights a little better if you want to maintain any respect......
     
    #56     May 11, 2007
  7. man

    man

    i don't defend ALL environmentalists but "environmentalism"
    as such. and well, i do not think i gained any respect so
    there is none to maintain.
     
    #57     May 11, 2007