World War III

Discussion in 'Politics' started by The Kin2, Jul 15, 2006.

  1. Did anybody of those Bush haters give it some thought about what would have hapenned right now in the Lebanon conflict with Ol' Saddam still in place? :D
     
    #11     Jul 21, 2006
  2. The right thing?
     
    #12     Jul 21, 2006
  3. We would have an army ready to intervene if necessary.
     
    #13     Jul 21, 2006
  4. Y we wouldnt have to worry about the fanatics taking 2 countries instead of 1
     
    #14     Jul 21, 2006
  5. Nothing, Saddam was a sunni, Hezbollah is shia.
     
    #15     Jul 21, 2006
  6. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    Not to mention Newt too, and he is a historian, right? ( He got his PhD from Tulane in Modern European History. I guess he missed the World history part.) So 2 of the smallest countries rockets and shells each other and that is a World War.

    I don't know the definition of WW, but I know one when I see it....

    I promise I will post it here, when I see one....
     
    #16     Jul 21, 2006
  7. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    Yeah, I would say a big chunk of the World itself has to participate in it. WW2 became a truly WW only after America entered it.
     
    #17     Jul 21, 2006