World War 3 is it coming?

Discussion in 'Economics' started by bat1, Jul 20, 2010.

  1. at this pt, it is the best option for mankind.
     
    #161     Aug 4, 2010
  2. olias

    olias

    Is there any media outlet you trust? Seems like all media have an agenda and/or an axe to grind. This is especially true of anything related to Israel.
     
    #162     Aug 4, 2010
  3. The reason I have written "hidden desire" is that, no country dares say in front of the world that they want to rule this world. They are silent because they do not have the most powerful army.

    During world war 2 Germany had the most powerful army and Hitler used to say that Germans are superior and Germany should rule the world.

    Just wait till a country which has a massive population has the most powerful army. They will go out to rule this world.
     
    #163     Aug 5, 2010
  4. The Roman empire withstood invasions by all other races except for the Germans. History proves Germans are superior than most other races. Western history is all about German history. The largest industrialized nations are all Germanic races. Western Europe and Scandinavians are all from Germanic stock. Germans are not a parasitic race leeching off the success of other races, they are hard working and ethical. If you want smart hard working kids you get a German wife.



     
    #164     Aug 5, 2010
  5. I agree Germans are superior people but nobody is superior than me.
     
    #165     Aug 5, 2010
  6. Germany lost WWII because Japan attacked USA, which forced Germany to declare war on USA. American companies were already working on plans to do business with Germany at the time of Pearl Harbor. So, If Japan had attacked USSR instead, I don't think USA would have declared war on Germany.

    Since Japan had around 5Million troops in China near USSR, they could have easily split the army in two and attacked USSR without losing any ground in China. I say this because the Chinese army had about the same number of soldiers but was terribly equipped. Also, Japan had the Zero fighter in 1941, which was better than any USSR plane. Lack of airpower was the reason Japan lost some skirmishes to USSR earlier.

    The reason I believe Japan attacked USA instead of hitting a USSR
    weakened severely by Germany was that the Japanese navy needed something to do. The Japanese navy had seen little combat and was just used to ferry supplies to China. The navy wanted action and saw attacking UK and US as a way to get involved in the war.

    Eastern USSR had way more resources than some far flung islands in the middle of the ocean. The resources were relatively close to Japan's colonies in China so as to be brought in by road or rail. I'm sure the Japanese leadership saw this too, but because the navy wanted action, and kept begging for something to do in the war, the Japanese leadership gave in. Japan bringing USA into the war, and not helping Germany finish off a weakened USSR by attacking in September or October 1941, was the worst military decision in history. There is no way USSR could have survived a two front war, since Germany made it to Moscow with the USSR not having to split it's forces.

    To further make the point, look at how fast France Fell, when Italy attacked them after Germany had weakened their military.

    Had the USSR fell, with Communist China falling very soon after, USA would have had to use the Atom bomb on both Japan and Germany to end the war.
     
    #166     Aug 5, 2010
  7. They never met directly but Han Chinese forces was able to reach as far as far west in 97 AD as modern day Ukraine, and had a miltary establishment of 70,000 men on the shores to the Caspian Sea.

    In 104 and 102 BC, Chinese armies met and defeated Roman forces in a former Greek kingom called Sogdiana.


    Envoys were sent by Roman Emperor Antonius Pius and greeted by Emperor Huan in 166. The exhanges led to further trade and the establishment of the "Silk Road".
     
    #167     Aug 5, 2010
  8. Jeff700

    Jeff700

    This thread is about coming World War 3

    well here you go the people who will start it

    Israeli president brags how he deceived President Clinton into believing he (Netanyahu) was helping implement the Oslo accords when he was actually destroying them.

    http://www.israel-palestinenews.org...e-deceived.html

    Bragging how Americans support Israel no matter what even against their own interested

    “America is something that can be easily moved. Moved in the right direction. … They won’t get in our way. … Eighty percent of the Americans support us. It’s absurd.”
     
    #168     Aug 5, 2010
  9. I think Germany was defeated in world war 2 because Germany did not have the man-power. Germany was fighting many countries at the same time. If Germany had a population of 500 million or 1 billion than Germany would be ruling this world now.
     
    #169     Aug 6, 2010
  10. Check a map of Europe from around early 1942. Germany, and their Allies, controlled virtually all of Europe except for the UK islands. They had plenty of manpower. The problem was that, once the US entered the war, the US spent 85% of it's resources to fight Germany and only 15% to fight Japan. So, even though Germany was smart enough not to incite America to enter the war, they had to deal with virtually all of America's military spending. And, perhaps most importantly, the US factories were not subject to around the clock bombing while Germany's were.

    Germany in 1942 had not yet been able to develop their colonies in Europe into the manufacturing centers they needed to be in order to fight America conventionally. If Japan had attacked USSR, or at the very least, delayed attacking US for another year or so, Germany would have been able to beat USSR and able to develop factories to take on USA.

    All this means is USA would have attacked Germany with the a-bomb until they surrendered.
     
    #170     Aug 6, 2010