World War 3 is it coming?

Discussion in 'Economics' started by bat1, Jul 20, 2010.

  1. The most dangerous people on earth are the Pakistan elite and the US Southern evangelical population. Both are irrational, inbred, semi-literate and have access to nuclear weapons.

    These are 2 of the most regressive mentally diminutive global populations bent on unleashing their versions of Armageddon on the rest of the worlds population.

    The Central African christian Hutus are another regressive group. But they don't have nukes so we allow them continue eating the pygmies.


     
    #101     Jul 27, 2010
  2. dtan1e

    dtan1e

    to the Iranians the US is most dangerous
     
    #102     Jul 27, 2010
  3. bat1

    bat1

    So, why not have the United States declare a fake war on Russia (a grudge match that is, after all, long overdue)? Both countries could immediately order full employment and revitalize their respective manufacturing sectors. Instead of live munitions, we could build all varieties of paint guns, water balloons, and stink bombs.

    This will not work. As there will be to many people
    wanting a Job!

    The point of War is to get everyone working right?
    how can you have everyone working with no one
    dying?

    People must die to make room for others!
     
    #103     Jul 27, 2010
  4. dtan1e

    dtan1e

    One go to war so to obtain some gain so the defeated mst concede something
     
    #104     Jul 28, 2010
  5. 18 pages of garbage and not one person has pointed out the fact that America is already at war.

    The Iraq War has so far cost 3 trillion dollars and it is the very reason the country is stuffed.

    If US government spent that money on infastructure projects in the US, unemployment would be 4% not 10% and GDP growth would be 5% instead of 1%.

    Spending trillions to make smart bombs for blowing up goat farmers is not good for the American economy. If you believe any different, you are delusional.
     
    #105     Jul 28, 2010
  6. toc

    toc

    'Spending trillions to make smart bombs for blowing up goat farmers is not good for the American economy.'


    Very well said............terrorism can be and is mostly be done even with a butter knife and similar cheap tools, so $150M F-22s do not help much. :D :p
     
    #106     Jul 28, 2010
  7. #107     Jul 28, 2010
  8. bat1

    bat1


    Your very right indeed!

    Iraq was a waste

    I don't call Iraq a war I call it a waste of money and life!

    War must have meaning to succeed and have a good
    outcome..

    Sorry to say, but when the real war comes are best
    leaders will not be there to lead in Combat!

    Afghanistan war is also a waste

    we will never win that war. Russia tried for 8 yrs
    and failed!

    what makes you think we can do any better?

    The policy in both Afghanistan and Iraq was to
    build a strong Police force there and leave

    there is to much corruption for that to ever hold
    ground..

    nothing but trillion dollar Failures and wasted lives..
     
    #108     Jul 28, 2010
  9. Bin Laden's "Profit Factor" 3,000:1 or should be ROI?
     
    #109     Jul 28, 2010
  10. piezoe

    piezoe

    Good counting bearice, the next one will be number three all-right. Congratulations on addition well done.

    Oh, and bearice, This caught my eye.
    "Just as forest fire is necessary for the better growth of the forest. Similarly War leads to better life for people who survive." -quote by bearice.

    If this is true, would you say five wars is better than one? In other words, is the relationship between war and good times direct and linear? If so, I say, to quote a great "ameerican", "Bring 'em On." :D
     
    #110     Jul 28, 2010