its not just trump... soros and the democrats have been transporting people paying for signs for a long. . its all part of the manufactured news. the cronies desire to have a lot of dumb people voting for fewer and fewer liberties and elite rule. The media puts up pictures or riots and then implies the majority of the country are on their side. And even though its not... if they can peel off enough swing voters they get to have hillary destroy our freedom. It was very close. Had the media played it straight Trump would have won by millions. I became aware of this as a volunteer. I donated a lot of time back then to keep water clean. I was about file a suit on behalf if an environmental group. (I had worked on a few back then.) Then they pulled funding fees and experts at the last minute. The city would have been the plaintiff. We were trying to get them to follow the law. I was like how on earth would this group change their mind. Then I found out the funding for the group was coming from the city. It was astro turf before it was even called astro turf. Many of these groups get money to organize from govt or soros... to support leftist issues when no one really cares enough to fund them or run them as volunteers.
I think it's disingenuous to tie together the financial support of freedom of assembly and peaceful demonstration to the inevitable shitfest that can occur when a few anarchists (admittedly many left-leaning) sneak into a crowd. It's no different than Super-PAC funded events in my point of view. Yes, I will admit from observation that left-leaning demonstrations tend to hit the crapper in higher proportion than right leaning. I blame it most on the demographics, mostly young, mostly disenfranchised minorities w/poor backgrounds and a penchant for fuckery. No 200k/yr grandpa is going to start shit and risk a day in jail. I am not excusing the behavior, just pointing the obvious. Also, which demonstrations tend to be suppressed and/or have a higher police presence would be interesting to know. Adding fuel to the conspiracy fire, what about agents provocateur and/or saboteur (plenty of those accusations were thrown when Trump's rallies turned sour)?
Some of those incidents clearly went over the line and those guilty should have been prosecuted to the full extent of the law. However, there is no evidence tying any of them to the Tea Party, just assumptions. Other incidents listed in those articles are just silly: "Palin saying 'time to reload'..." Give me a break. How many on the left have called for Trump's assassination overtly? I cannot accept some of those links you posted. You really believe a site called "Americans Against the Tea Party" is going to post unbiased accounts on the Tea Party? Come on. Violence has no place in protesting, regardless of the side of political fence.
Can't find disagreement in much of this. The question becomes when protesters are "imported" into the area, like Ferguson, or town halls where half the constituents are from another state. Clearly there is an underground, funded movement that provides these folks with money to do this sort of thing.
Marc Lamont Hill gets owned Fake News — CNN’s Marc Lamont Hill: Conservatives Start Violent Campus Riots, Too
How true Their fear is that the policies and rulings driven by Trump will open the door to a dictatorship (post Trump)
In reality you are text book Nazi, an extremist right wing kook with severe racist beliefs. You'd have fit right in. Amazing how many of you are woefully unaware of where Nazi's existed on the political spectrum.