That is complete and utter nonsense. Don't believe everything you step on. The very purpose of Open Society is to combat authoritarianism. A liberal is, by definition, against authoritarianism. Know your English.
That is because you are an imbecile. You and your fellow Mackenzie brother (nine ender) are on a roll today.
1. when freddie has no response he goes for the douchey comment. the reason he had no response is because what I wrote was true. 50 k from soros to Berkeley rioters. http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2017/...oup-behind-berkeley-riot-funded-george-soros/ 2. Soros hates americas freedoms. His open society is all about being open to central remote rule.
Not only do I know my English. I also face basic realities. "Open Society" is about imposing Soros' vision on the world. The current definition of "liberal" is socialist - rather than neo-classical liberal. Stalin is a good example of a socialist who supported authoritarianism and drove his vision of "open society".
Yeah nothing says "im against authoritarianism" more than assaulting and destroying everyone who disagrees with you.
Come on, you know better. People against authoritarianism will not tolerate a move in that direction. Are you suggesting that someone against authoritarianism should welcome it? Did you really think it through? The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke