Seems like ET keeps trimming out all opposition to the past questionable behavior about Wizetrade. Does censorship really prove anything?
That's because the comments weren't even related to the thread topic. For example, the last thread was about a free trial to WizeTrade for Options, which a product for Options trading that costs $149 a month after the trial period ends. But for some reason, people wanted use that thread to talk about past experiences with a completely different product, namely the original Wizetrade software which cost several thousand bucks.
I think there is a feeling though, that the apple does not fall far from the tree. When someone has a history of scams, why are they all of a sudden pure because they are a sponsor with a different product? No offense, just not sure why Wizetrade couldn't address the issues people raised, rather than deleting the posts.
Because to discuss those things is completely off-topic to the point of the thread. If people want to talk about other issues related to another product like Wizetrade for Stocks or about the company in general, that's fine as long as it's in a thread which is specifically for that purpose.