The fact that you posted the actual blog entry itself in the same body as Tim's comments including blurbs about his book. The fucking blog entry wasn't about his book, he spammed the blog entry with that shit and then you(being his retarded cousin that you are) were dumb enough to post the entire thing as if it were all related. stock_turder might have a higher IQ than you actually. This is amazing, someone should alert the retarded media that the anomaly has a cousin! If you still don't understand you're really beyond clueless. The link to the blog only shows how dumb you are and that what you did was post something completely inappropriately and out of context of how it appears on the blog. Not as an entry about Tim's book at all. Do you fucking get it now dummy?!
Actually it is you who are in the wrong (as usual) because Surf was only trying to highlight the three blurbs included in my post. I have over 75 such blurbs now, but I only posted a few short ones in order to get more bloggers to review my book.
Here's another blurb for you: You are a loser. You are a charlatan. You are a buffoon. You speak in doubletalk and flim flam. You can't stand up and say : I am Timmy Otoole, I am a trader who hasn't turned a profit in years. I have written a book for some reason or another. I hope you find it useful. Please learn from my mistakes. Oh, no no no....It has to be Well Gee whiz, the chart looks great! I am on CNBC promoting my book, but not really. I am a whizbang trader but I also am not a good trader, so learn from my mistakes, but damn I am an awesome trader....and I am not just some peon normal trader, I run a "hedge fund" (lol), so I am better than you and I should be on CNBC more so I can talk about how a great a chart looks because for some reason I am more qualified than you to know what I am talking about. Read my book, it's great, I am such a great marketer! I only say I am a good trader because it's marketing, which is why I also have misleading titles and keywords, in order to mislead someone doing a search on Amazon for a real classic on trading....this might fool some neophyte into buying my book, which of course is good marketing.......but I am not really concerned about marketing, which is why I wrote the book, to help people; even though I contradict myself with misleading titles in order to confuse someone new to the game into buying my awesome book! (I made this as convoluted as possible in order to better reflect your moronic ramblings).
Tell them you want to do a show about NOTHING. If you get any negative vibes just threaten to walk - "I for one will NOT compromise my artistic integrity!"
And so he posted the entire blog entry and didn't decipher that the blog entry was entirely separate from your spamming why?! How am I wrong about him misleadingly posting two things that were not meant to be exclusive on a webpage in a manner that made them look exclusive? You spammed the page and that's how two things that weren't supposed to be together were you fucking idiot. Can both of you really be this dumb or is this just some sort of ruse? And that wasn't your post you fucking idiot, you spammed some poor guy's blog with spam about your book. How much money has your fund lost lately? How about this for the cover of a book about your "fund"
The poll results are a very accurate gage of timmays approal. With a "1" being highest and 4 being lowest, timmay rates a 3. He rated 2.8 after 50 votes, 2.9 after 100 votes, and now a 3 after over 200 votes. My interpretation is that means that 2/3 of the pool of interested and potential parties in tim, would not consider reading his book at all. So timmay has already alienated 2/3 of his possible population of readers. Timmay has approx 35% saying they are interested. I'll go higher than marketsmurfs 1% success rate being great. Let's say timmay has 3% success rate, Well, 1/3 say (for "free") they are interested in this book. 10,000+ (for "free") emails have been sent to tim. At a 3% success rate of converting thet "free" to $$ paying for his book, well it all comes down to whats in the 'pool of buyers' denominator of the equation. marketsmurf is a piker/joker (in case you didnt know it by his DJIA death short) for saying the pool of potential buyers is millions. It's probably, at its highest, in the low 100,000's. Summary: 3% x 150,000 = 4500 books sold. Conclusion: failure after expenses.
... and yes, we all know it's very common to amass a million bucks before you graduate college. Business Week Wow, this really is a pretty jaded bunch ... Jimmy Jam
Damn girl, you're desperate to defend Tim. Tim may have made some money, but why hasn't he made any recently? Answer: He can't! In different interviews, Tim has stated that he had luck. Why is it that you like Tim so much considering he's losing money and his fund's investors have pulled their investments for the most part?! You're pretty pitiful. Are you still a paper trading college kid? Sounds like it, only a loser who hadn't made their own stake trading/investing would respect Tim for making money even though he's lost a lot of it and has only turned a whopping 1.5% return over the last 4 years. That's a horrible statistic, it doesn't bother you at all?!