"Why won't God heal amputees?"

Discussion in 'Politics' started by lkh, Jun 9, 2006.

  1. [​IMG]

    Come on man, don't you believe in miracles?
     
    #381     Aug 16, 2006
  2. My point was, that it was ok for you to view that diseases were created by God. However, that was not intentional on God's part in the sense that God did not target any person in particular, or just humans. Many diseases were spread among animals before they got to humans. So the fact is, there is no contradiction between science and God in this regard. Science studies what causes the diseases (bacteria, viruses) and what can cure them (medicine). It is also true that historically humans have attributed much more to God's direct actions (one person's disease) that today are known by science to be caused by things such as contact with a source of infection. As the sphere of knowledge increases, the mystery about these things recedes so we're less likely to incorrectly attribute things in nature to God when it isn't really His doing, directly anyway.
     
    #382     Aug 16, 2006
  3. All generalizations are false.:D
     
    #383     Aug 16, 2006

  4. Dude, you are a sophist and a post-modernist of the first order. Your ability to obfuscate could put a ninja's smokescreen to shame. Derrida would be impressed.
     
    #384     Aug 16, 2006
  5. stu

    stu

    No. I said I don't like to define any statement as "absolute" . Is this the only way you can defend your argument by making up meanings to people's replies other than what they actually say? What can't you understand that gets you so mixed up that way?
    You are at least one line off the Bottom Line:
    For ' Laws of logic ' to exist you must first presuppose existence. They will first depend on existence before they can do anything at all.
    I made no mention of them being dependant on people's minds or thinking. That is a definition of the Laws of logic. but you cannot define the Laws of ligic into existence. They either firstly have existsence (they exist) or they do not no matter how much you define them..
     
    #385     Aug 16, 2006
  6. Aapex

    Aapex

    Since existance is the "state or act of existing"
    And Knowledge is "The psychological result of perception and learning and reasoning"

    The matter must rest based on ones owns presuppositions.
    Existance is not reliant upon reason. The state of being is independant of perception.

    Whether or not something exists does not depend on whether or not it can be described. If something exists, it exists independently of someone's ability to describe it. That is the nature of existence; that is, things exist whether or not someone knows it exists, let alone accurately describe its existence.

    Furthermore, something that exists is not limited in existence by the inability of someone to accurately describe its existence. For example, there are galaxies and phenomenon within galaxies that have not yet been discovered. But this does not mean that they do not exist since we cannot describe knowledgeably, sufficiently, or accurately.

    We know that things exist which are difficult to adequately describe.

    As far as God is concerned. God can be described, though not perfectly. He can be sufficiently described so that we can gain an understanding of His nature, greatness, and differences from ourselves. Though we will always fall short when trying to describe an infinite being, we can still say enough about Him to convey who and what He is so that the concept of God can be communicated. We can say that He is infinite, gracious, loving, all knowing, all-powerful, all present, holy, pure, righteous, that he is not flesh and bones, the only uncaused and infinitely eternal being in existence, etc. Though we may not be able to perfectly describe Him we can describe Him by listing His attributes and qualities. Attributes and qualities reflect the nature of the thing described. Therefore, we can describe God and our insufficiency to adequately describe Him in certain areas does not diminish His existence nor mean that He does not exist. It simply means that He is great.



    :cool:
     
    #386     Aug 17, 2006
  7. lkh

    lkh

    Proof #5 - Read the Bible

    Imagine that we are good friends. One day we are talking:

    Me: Wow, you will not believe this new book I've been reading!
    You: What's it about?

    Me: It is a manual for living a better life. It is also a guide to creating a better society for ourselves and our children. It has changed my life!

    You: That sounds like an important book. Who wrote it?

    Me: The author is supposed to be the smartest person in the universe.

    You: That's amazing -- if the author is the smartest person in the universe, the book must be absolutely brilliant. I can't wait to see it. Do you have a copy with you?

    Me: Absolutely! I carry it with me everywhere I go! Here, have a look for yourself...

    You open the book to a random page, and you find this:
    Any of the people of Israel, or of the aliens who reside in Israel, who give any of their offspring to Molech shall be put to death; the people of the land shall stone them to death. I myself will set my face against them, and will cut them off from the people, because they have given of their offspring to Molech, defiling my sanctuary and profaning my holy name. And if the people of the land should ever close their eyes to them, when they give of their offspring to Molech, and do not put them to death, I myself will set my face against them and against their family, and will cut them off from among their people, them and all who follow them in prostituting themselves to Molech.
    If any turn to mediums and wizards, prostituting themselves to them, I will set my face against them, and will cut them off from the people. Consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy; for I am the Lord your God. Keep my statutes, and observe them; I am the Lord; I sanctify you. All who curse father or mother shall be put to death; having cursed father or mother, their blood is upon them.

    If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbour, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall be put to death. The man who lies with his father’s wife has uncovered his father’s nakedness; both of them shall be put to death; their blood is upon them. If a man lies with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall be put to death; they have committed perversion; their blood is upon them. If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death; their blood is upon them. [Leviticus, chapter 20]


    You are not quite sure what to say. You look at me for a moment.
    You: I thought you said that this is written by the most intelligent person in the universe. If we are going to follow what this author says, we have to kill half the people in America. We are supposed to kill everyone who has cursed his father or mother, everyone who has committed adultery, and every homosexual.
    Me: Well, that's in the old testament, you see. The book is really two books, and the "old" part of the book doesn't really apply.

    You: Are you saying that the smartest person in the universe once wanted us to kill every adulterer and homosexual, but then changed his mind? That somehow makes it better? If the "old part" no longer applies, then why did you hand it to me when I asked to see the book?

    Me: Well, parts of it do apply.

    You: Didn't you just tell me that it doesn't apply?

    You open the book to another random page and you find this:
    When you buy a male Hebrew slave, he shall serve for six years, but in the seventh he shall go out a free person, without debt. If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master’s and he shall go out alone. But if the slave declares, ‘I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out a free person’, then his master shall bring him before God. He shall be brought to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall pierce his ear with an awl; and he shall serve him for life.
    When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do. If she does not please her master, who designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed; he shall have no right to sell her to a foreign people, since he has dealt unfairly with her. If he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her as with a daughter. If he takes another wife to himself, he shall not diminish the food, clothing, or marital rights of the first wife. And if he does not do these three things for her, she shall go out without debt, without payment of money.

    Whoever strikes a person mortally shall be put to death. If it was not premeditated, but came about by an act of God, then I will appoint for you a place to which the killer may flee. But if someone wilfully attacks and kills another by treachery, you shall take the killer from my altar for execution.

    Whoever strikes father or mother shall be put to death.

    Whoever kidnaps a person, whether that person has been sold or is still held in possession, shall be put to death. Whoever curses father or mother shall be put to death.

    When individuals quarrel and one strikes the other with a stone or fist so that the injured party, though not dead, is confined to bed, but recovers and walks around outside with the help of a staff, then the assailant shall be free of liability, except to pay for the loss of time, and to arrange for full recovery.

    When a slave-owner strikes a male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies immediately, the owner shall be punished. But if the slave survives for a day or two, there is no punishment; for the slave is the owner’s property. [Exodus, chapter 21]

    Again, you are dumfounded. Here the author of the book is advocating slavery, the branding of slaves, and the wholesale beating of slaves. You are not quite sure what to say. You look at me for a moment.
    You: You have to be kidding me. Here the "smartest person in the universe" is telling us that slavery is OK and that we are free to beat our slaves.
    You open the book to another random page and you find this:
    I desire, then, that in every place the men should pray, lifting up holy hands without anger or argument; also that the women should dress themselves modestly and decently in suitable clothing, not with their hair braided, or with gold, pearls, or expensive clothes, but with good works, as is proper for women who profess reverence for God. Let a woman learn in silence with full submission. I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet she will be saved through childbearing, provided they continue in faith and love and holiness, with modesty. [1 Timothy, chapter 2]
    You are nearly speechless. But you manage to find your voice.
    You: Is this some kind of joke? "I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man." That is totally sexist! In America, there are millions of female teachers and we have women throughout our corporate and govenment hierarchies. No intelligent person believes that women should be silenced.
    As you page through the book further you find that it is totally sexist from beginning to end.
    You keep opening the book to random pages, and nearly everything you find is utter nonsense. Either it is meaningless, completely irrelevant, disgusting or downright wrong.
     
    #387     Aug 17, 2006
  8. lkh

    lkh

    If you are a scientist it is even worse, and it starts with the very first line:

    In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth...
    That's not true. In the beginning a natural event created the universe as we know it, and the earth did not form until billions of years later. The creation story in Genesis is completely wrong. Simply read Genesis and you can see it. For example, the Bible says that light and darkness are created after the water but before the sun. Everyone knows that the sun came first, then the planet and its rotation (which is what causes light and darkness to occur on a daily basis) and then the water, and this all happened over million of years. There are many other problems with the Bible:
    Man did not come from a handful of dust through some mythological being. Man evolved from other species like every other living thing has for hundreds of millions of years.
    The Bible talks about a world-wide flood that covered earth in 5.5 miles of water and killed everything, yet we know it never happened. That is clear from the archeolgical record.
    There was no tower of Babble.
    The list goes on and on. The Bible is nonsense in a thousand different scientific ways.
    Ask yourself this simple question: Why, when you read the Bible, are you not left in awe? Why doesn't a book written by an omniscient being leave you with a sense of wonder and amazement? If you are reading a book written by the all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving creator of the universe, wouldn't you expect to be stunned by the brilliance, the clarity and the wisdom of the author? Would you not expect each new page to intoxicate you with its incredible prose and its spectacular insight? Wouldn't you expect the author to tell us things that scientists have not been able to discover yet?

    Yet, when we open the Bible and actually read it, we find it is nothing like that at all. Instead of leaving us in awe, it leaves us dumbfounded by all of the nonsense and backwardness that it contains. If you read what the Bible actually says, you find that the Bible is ridiculous. The examples shown above barely scratch the surface of the Bible's numerous problems. If we are honest with ourselves, it is obvious that an "all-knowing" God had absolutely nothing to do with this book.

    The reason why the Bible contains so much nonsense is because God is imaginary. The Bible is a book written thousands of years ago by primitive men. A book that advocates senseless murder, slavery and the oppression of women has no place in our society today.
     
    #388     Aug 17, 2006
  9. Aapex

    Aapex

    I'd like to see you prove this argument.
     
    #389     Aug 17, 2006
  10. Aapex

    Aapex

    What proof do you have to support this statement?
     
    #390     Aug 17, 2006