I give you props for passing the duplicity test. I suspect though that the SSM lobby would be horrified if incest marriage rights accompanied them on the same ballot iniative....
I don't expect that people are going to put scientific fact before their religions, and I doubt that they are going to think much that they are the product of an incestuous relationship dating back thousands of generations...
My sexual preference is none of anyone's business. The fact that you would even ask is an absurdity to me. I support human rights to love each other, gay, straight, with many wives, with whomever they chose as long as it doesn't harm anyone else.
I don't think animal homosexuality is natural from a sex drive point of view, Animal homosexuality is primarily a social and political act. Mostly used to reinforce social hierarchy, dominance. I doubt animals see a difference between grooming the Alpha male or getting bonked by that same male. What is natural behavior ,and the primary purpose of animals is to reproduce. When a small population acts a certain way it is deviant behavior. The gays know this. Their agenda it to create more gays to get above the deviant level. This is the reasoning behind the alternate but equal lifestyle and the push into education. In Chicago they want a separate high school just for gays.
this is part of the reason some were saying blacks supported prop 8. Your comparison of gay marriage to minority rights is specious. Gays have equality. No one is allowed to discriminate against them because they are gay in - CA. Period. This marriage thing is a bullshit political move. Answer this - what will marriage give them that Civil Unions in CA will not. (legally speaking). And then why should should not grant the same rights to two men and woman? Until you can answer simple questions stopit with the bullshit comparison to real civil rights movements. It insults what Obama just achieved.
Just exactly is natural from a sex point of drive, from a scientific point of view? As far as a small part of a population acting differently being deviant, than I would have to say that out of the entire population who attempts to trade, those who are successful are deviant...given the norm is failure.
Is homosexuality natural? Of course. It isn't some product of science or technology run amok, it's ancient. But natural and normal are two different things. Birth defects are also natural, but that doesn't make them normal or acceptable. Before your head explodes, I'm not saying homosexuality is a birth defect. But it is certainly abnormal, mayhap even clinically deviant behavior. I'm not one to claim that homosexuality is a choice. For many it may well be congenital. That's why I have no problem with gay civil unions and I also voted against Prop 22. But the more I think about SSM, the less it seems to be anything but a political move to claim homosexuality is normal, which it is not. Natural yes, normal no.
Animal homosexuality is not a preference or a choice between male or female. It is used to support social order. Human gays is when sexual impulses substitute the natural urge for reproduction. Is reproduction a natural urge? Yes, it would be hard to reject that premise. Deviancy is a neutral state. It is not a judgment on right or wrong. It simple says when a population is under 5% it is not the "norm". Certainly, successful traders are not the "norm"