Why We Should Never Compromise On Gun Rights

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AAAintheBeltway, Mar 26, 2018.

  1. Poindexter

    Poindexter

    Sorry about your problem but projection won't help. :(
    Thanks for opening my eyes to the fact that filthy, Constitution-hating leftists like you are out there. I've joined the NRA and will be making regular donations to them. :D

    NRA - Copy.jpg
     
    #181     Mar 31, 2018
    AAAintheBeltway likes this.
  2. Poindexter

    Poindexter

    If leftists ever succeeded in abolishing the Second Amendment, the First Amendment would immediately follow. And by that I mean formally because even now they're trying to stifle free speech every day with political correctness, phony accusations of racism, boycotts, etc.
     
    #182     Mar 31, 2018
  3. [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
    #183     Mar 31, 2018
    piezoe and Frederick Foresight like this.
  4. Good man. A Life Membership is a good deal.
     
    #184     Mar 31, 2018
    Poindexter likes this.
  5. No need to compromise on gun laws. Banks and the rest of American commerce will take care of it

    CNN: Bank of America to stop lending to makers of 'military-style firearms' http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwu_i9yTo
     
    #185     Apr 12, 2018
  6. Maybe Wells Fargo will join in too. Because they are the great defenders of American freedom and ethics.

    giggle.
     
    #186     Apr 12, 2018
  7. If only those who never sinned can do the right thing for once then this world would look a lot worse would you not agree?

     
    #187     Apr 12, 2018
  8. Evil in a suit.
     
    #188     Apr 12, 2018
  9. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Hey Futurecurrents, why don't you post any pictures of the hundreds and hundreds of kids that have been victims of illegal gun violence in Chicago alone? Is it because they're black?
     
    #189     Apr 12, 2018
  10. Why don't you first explain why you seem to have a huge issue with banning assault rifles (which you seem to argue would just open the door for more confiscations, and that the average Joe would then be outgunned by criminal subjects), yet you are at the same time not promoting the idea that ordinary civilians should have hand grenades and bazooka and the like. After all that is the arsenal many criminals have access to for the right pocket change. Somehow your entire argument against disarmament relies on the claim that ordinary citizens would then not be able to defend themselves. Yet why do bazookas go too far? Why are they not allowed to be purchased? The 2nd amendment neither mentions assault rifles nor bazookas. Honestly curious how you deal with this seeming dichotomy.

     
    #190     Apr 12, 2018
    piezoe likes this.