Why was the "Objections to SCT" thread closed?

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by Thunderdog, Mar 27, 2007.

  1. Makes sense. Sorry for the sensitive ones...:D
     
    #61     Mar 30, 2007
  2. See attached.
     
    #62     Mar 30, 2007
  3. I encourage everyone to read Jack's post above closely several times. Preferably aloud. Looking at yourself unselfconsciously in the mirror. Keep a hankie handy. For tears or ejaculate depends on you.
     
    #63     Mar 30, 2007
  4. Er, ok Thunderdog, whatever you say!
     
    #64     Mar 30, 2007

  5. Jack,

    I am not sure if I feel that building a "fortress" around a present or past believe system is the best approach to eliminating the system.

    I would much prefer throwing it off a cliff...

    Just a thought.
     
    #65     Mar 30, 2007
  6. There is an on going war of subterfuge against Jack Hershey and his work by those who are worried that he has already put out in the open too much information. If you care to notice, the insults come from those who dislike Jack Hershey putting this knowledge out in the open.

    He has dared to bring into the open the inner dynamics of the market, and therefore the concerted effort to discredit him and his work.

    My advise to those who are interested in learning from Jack. There are steps you have to personally follow to prepare yourself mentally for his work. Ideally several years of testing the markets with other methods and systems until you have some idea of market structure.

    Then once you have developed your own mental frame work of market structure, only then will you be able to effectively overlay Jack Hersheys work on top of your own frame work.

    His system is not for new traders, you need a lot of market experience to begin to understand his work. The knowledge he provides is at an extreme mental envelope where only a few will be able to get to. Without prior knowledge about the markets you have no way of getting there.
     
    #66     Mar 31, 2007
  7. Oh, really? I thought Jack frowned on, and ridiculed, what he refers to as "conventional orthdoxy," that being anything non-Jack. And anyone who doesn't think as Jack does, is thinking inside the box, according to Jack, and is in desperate need of one of his "paradigm shifts." So, if this is the case, then why would anyone want to begin a few steps backwards by learning something he would then have to unlearn once he started Jacking? Pissy, you may wish to confer with Jack before issuing your proclamation about The Great One and His Grand Vision.
     
    #67     Mar 31, 2007
  8. Now THAT is richly paranoid! The B-Team is a cabal that wants to preserve the conventional orthodoxy that causes the majority of traders to lose? How much will YOU pay us to stop? Make us a counteroffer!
     
    #68     Mar 31, 2007
  9. Further to Dr. Deco's proposal, please be advised that any acceptable offer ("counteroffer?") will have to be in the form of small, unmarked bills with non-sequential serial numbers stuffed into a nondescript size 7 shoe box. A suitable drop point will be discussed at the appropriate time. Tell no one.

    (This is fun. I've always wanted to be in a cabal.)
     
    #69     Mar 31, 2007
  10. As an aside, Dr. Deco, your reference to the B-Team, while contextually accurate, may turn out to be an unfortunate term of reference in the fullness of time. Jack's gaggle of lawyers may deem at some point that we are engaging in copyright or trademark infringement. Coincidentally, as it happens, the entirely appropriate "B-Team" moniker sounds a lot like the "BE-DO-HAVE Team," and may be misconstrued as an abbreviated reference for same. So you can see the potential for misunderstanding and "subterfuge."
     
    #70     Mar 31, 2007