why voters are angry in one graph

Discussion in 'Economics' started by DB_sezwhat, Jul 17, 2010.

  1. Troll? YOU'RE still peddling the same lame libtard lie that not even Obama would attempt. The data is NOT from Heritage, it's from the CEA and OMB, both part of the Executive Office of the President. In other words, FROM THE OBAMA ADMNISTRATION. And that's clearly marked on the chart. So spare us your baseless Heritage hysteria.
     
    #11     Jul 18, 2010
  2. This from the guy with "failed" in his nic :p

     
    #12     Jul 18, 2010
  3. Nice deflection, when did I say the data is from Heritage, the chart is from neocon group Heritage who thinks Obama is going to do a stimulus EVERY year, dumb Con.
     
    #13     Jul 18, 2010
  4. pspr

    pspr

    #14     Jul 18, 2010
  5. Typical libtard response. You implied it was from Heritage just like you're doing here.

    You're lamely trying to hide the fact that those projections are from the Obama Administration because you have nothing intelligent to say.

    How pathetic.
     
    #15     Jul 18, 2010
  6. I don't get all the crying from Americans really.

    You guys have been waging war and carpetbombing places for decades, stealing natural resources by installing corrupt warlords and printing paper money, backing a financial system that has become a virus infecting economies worldwide and the list goes on and on troughout history but oh my god what a problem it is when the US middle class comes under pressure...

    Something must be done about it, now! Those damn socialists in Washington!
     
    #16     Jul 18, 2010
  7. I wish ppl in the country could get the point. Dems and Repubs are working for the same corporate masters. Dems give a few more crumbs to the poor and Repubs a few more kickbacks to the corporate cronies.

    Neither party really wants immigration reform or any reform for that matter. Dems want new voters, illegals, and Repubs want cheap labor ,illegals again. Now before you go off thinking I am some tea party member I am not. If I were living in Mexico I would do the same.

    People in this country are so gullible its sad. Until we vote for someone else besides one of the 2 parties there will be no real change.

    John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, does a fantastic job of shining the light on the clandestine empire America has built post World War II. http://www.johnperkins.org/

    http://statismwatch.ca/2010/06/10/t...n-iran-discussed-world-treasury-dept-delayed/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA
     
    #17     Jul 18, 2010
  8. EVERY single economic stat shows Republicans are bad for the Average American and small business owner.

    Unless you are a Farmer or have more than 100 million stashed away, anyone who votes republican is a walking zombie. There's a reason the southern states that vote republican are right on par with African nations when it comes to education and transparency in govt.

    You voted republican? go get bent.

    You deserve a hell lot worse than whatever it is you are whining about
     
    #18     Jul 18, 2010
  9. Well, you SHOULD be. The Tea Party represents the BEST of America and American spirit... just as it did in Boston Harbor...
     
    #19     Jul 18, 2010
  10. Getting back to OP's graph, what's really going on is that waves and waver of "progressive" "pro-worker" legislation incentivize business managers to replace labor with technology. There's no risk the idiots in Congress will suddenly throw a mandate at you that makes it more expensive and risky to keep a <i>machine</i> on the "payroll." The beautiful thing is (for the Dem party, anyway) that the low-IQ crowd (perhaps inclusing OP) will blame the decrease in employment on <i>business</i>, who's reacting to the incentives Congress creates, rather than on Congress itself. If Congress and the Administration actually <i>wanted</i> increased hiring and employment, they'd do everything they could to increase the <i>flexibility</i> of prospective employers -- among other things, by making sure they were immune to lawsuits (alleging "age discrimination" or whatever) when they had to lay people off. Again, robots don't sue you...
     
    #20     Jul 18, 2010