No problem. Interestingly your supporting violent appropriation of citizen resources in order to achieve this solution. Totalitarianism.
The sad thing is that, in your mind, Hillary was the choice to go with. She would have helped address their grievances. Oh yeah, sure.
Thank you. I hope you had time to listen to the whole affair. IMO, this kind of thing is where we should spend our time, and in reading too of course.
Ooops, It should have been "In other words,... " I am a very bad typist. I had the ill fortune to go to school in that period between Adam and Eve and the late 20th Century when boys were in shop class making bookends and girls were learning to type. I blame the Bible for my bad typing.
That's fair enough, but I can't see any logic in it. I can't understand how anyone, regardless of their politics, could vote for a person with a serious mental problem to lead the country. Someone who is a pathological liar. And it is not clear to me how anyone, no matter how they would not want Ms Clinton to lead the country, and I put myself in that category, could possibly think that her defects and transgressions, none of which has led to indictment let alone conviction, rise to the level of Trump's transgressions and defects, though like Clinton, so far as i know, he has also never been indicted -- though that may be on the way. All candidates, by nature, are imperfect so we are always faced with weighing our political proclivities against the candidates imperfections. In the case of Trump, a man who has been a bully from childhood; a man with clinical narcissism; a man who has lied over and over again in the most transparent ways; a man who has been sued over 4,000 times; a man who has lost or settled many times and lied about it; a man with a record of making contractors sue to collect their due; a man who has admitted to groping women he hardly knew and bragged about it; a man who has failed miserably to deliver on the promises he made to his constituents and then backed policies that were clearly against their best interests; a man with numerous conflicts of interest; a man who has made enemies of those he needs to govern effectively; a man whose word can not be trusted; a man who's supporters consist mainly of low educated white males; a man so ignorant of government he did not realize that neither statutory nor constitutional law can be overturned by executive order; a man who is a bungling laughing stock to the majority of the population. Now some of these defects may also be ascribed to Clinton, or other politicians for that matter, but there is no comparison whatsoever between Clinton and Trump when it comes to the frequency at which these defects are displayed. The majority of the worst defects and transgressions are owned by Trump alone. As time goes on you will witness Republican Congressmen falling over themselves to distance themselves from Trump. I'd be embarrassed to admit I voted for such a man.
Perhaps the big picture would be Trump can be the best suitable candidate that the international head-hunters could find for matching a politician job description, of which the main assignment is to make a deal with Kim.