Why trading educators talk about entries 95% of the time?

Discussion in 'Trading' started by VEGASDESERT, May 22, 2020.

  1. virtusa

    virtusa

    This kind of postings have no value at all and are just a personal opinion without ANY proof at all. You wrote clearly"I would imagine...", so it is all in your imagination, has nothing to see with reality.
    For reality and hard proof, you need:
    • a list with names and track records of hundreds of "best traders". Hundreds because it should be statistically relevant.
    • you should have a written declaration with all details for each trader that clearly shows if he fits in your statement or not. They might even lie so even then you have no hard proof.
    You have neither, so it is like you said just your imagination.

    I can post the following and it would have the same value as your posting:
    "I would imagine and can't know for sure. but even the best traders on the planet
    if you talked about entries only, long term are always going to be better than maybe
    99% if they entered, place oco order, target equal to risk and walked away."

    • If good entries would matter, you can probably find examples that show that this is not correct.
    • If good exits would matter, you can probably find examples that show that this is not correct.
    • If good entries and good exits would matter, you can never find examples that show that that is not correct. Because the combination good entries and good exits cannot be beaten.

    PS: Good means the best possible. You can never beat the best possible as that would mean it was not the best possible.
     
    #151     May 25, 2020
    SimpleMeLike likes this.
  2. virtusa,

    Very nicely stated. Great post you wrote.
     
    #152     May 25, 2020
    vanzandt likes this.
  3. Another great post. Nicely written
     
    #153     May 25, 2020
    vanzandt likes this.
  4. VEGASDESERT

    VEGASDESERT

    Your post has no value either, it just states that my post has no value. It doesn't disprove
    my post.

    Let me ask you a very logical question, if the vast majority of volume is done by
    institutional traders that hire phd's, statisticians, engineers, data scientists and
    they are in every market all day every day, fully automated.

    What makes you believe there is a large edge to be had in the market?

    My statement of small edge is all you get, is waaaay more logical than your stupid ass
    post.

    Lets see your stats, put up or shut up and get off my thread.

    Boom, in your face.
     
    #154     May 25, 2020
    Sprout and SimpleMeLike like this.
  5. themickey

    themickey

    images.jpg

    Hehehehe :)
     
    #155     May 25, 2020
    Sekiyo likes this.
  6. wrbtrader

    wrbtrader

    The Good, Bad and the Ugly...



    wrbtrader
     
    #156     May 25, 2020
    volpri and KCalhoun like this.
  7. virtusa

    virtusa

    So you agree that your posting has zero value. Why post it then? Or do you only now realize how stupid the posting was?
    There is nothing to approve in your stupid posting without any value.
    The way you react shows it was rather boom in your face.

    tenor.gif
     
    #157     May 25, 2020
  8. VEGASDESERT

    VEGASDESERT

    are you still here? didn't I tell you to get lost?
     
    #158     May 25, 2020
  9. wrbtrader

    wrbtrader

    Once Upon A Time in the West...



    wrbtrader
     
    #159     May 25, 2020
    themickey and KCalhoun like this.
  10. virtusa

    virtusa

    Apparently you only want to discuss if people agree with you. That is not discuss, that's just being a "yes man".That blocks any enlightening.
    You will stay as stupid/smart as you were born. There is no room for improvement.
    I will go now, there is no reason to stay here anymore.
     
    #160     May 25, 2020