Neither are yours, so we are even Steven. Except we're not, because anyone who uses NT and AMP knows how to verify that I am posting the real, while you are not.
if you are doing topstep or any one of those things you have to scalp......the problem here is that scalping means high risk and you cannot take high risk because you will hit the daily drawdown.......it is not daily loss...you cannot go beyond that figure even if it recovers after that.that is why those evaluations are impossible and they get a lot of money in subscriptions. but that is not the reason they are doing this:they want to fund you and see you successful of course they have a right to make the test 'difficult' or impossible...........you should only take it if you are aware of these conditions and are confident that you can satisfy them
Funny, I always though scalping for a few ticks here and there was the least-risky thing one can do in trading. Tight profit targets with tight stops. The risk in each trade is minimal?
The tests are most certainly not impossible assuming you trade with low leverage. My criticism and skepticism of these firms are mostly concerning how they're not really interested in funding you and if they do fund you what you're really getting is $3.5K of risk capital at best and further funding is your own profits. So, in summary. A few of these firms don't even want to fund you. And those who may not mind if you're funded don't really provide you any funds anyway.