suma66âS bed suma66 sitting in his basement contemplating the next Jack Hershey wonderful post. If you ever thought of where your protection of Jack comes from these are rare photos of suma66's basement where he lives out the remainder of his life fighting the war for SCT. Some people go to school. Some people raise a family. Some people are learning how to trade. Some build houses. Just about everyone is concerned with bettering themselves in some way. Not suma66, he only cares about protecting Jack. He will sacrifice any means to make his life better for the benefit of jack. I hope the Hershey Stooges can appreciate suma66. ... see, I can take what you post and turn the shit over and around back at you too Bwahahahah -
suma66 is so dedicated to jack, he doesn't even buy nice dress shoes, preferring to run around wearing cheap tennis shoes, like the good little errand boy he is. P.S. Now THAT is some dedication!!! :eek:
T, what does get me about your constant berating of Jack, though well deserved, is that Jack is pretty clear that his system is primarily for futures trading. Your results are to be expected as stocks do not move the same as futures. Furthermore, just by the use of "volume" is exclusive to ES trading. That much is obvious. 20000 shares in a stock is quite different than 20000 contracts. It is not a very worthwhile backtest. If you still have the ability, you can test on .SPX. That's what the data is for, and it should be obvious. Getting losing results on 500 stocks is expected, as the program is designed for .SPX in WL. Even if you just used Jack's variables, you'd still annualize at near 200% APR. By changing a couple of the variables, you get 660+% APR or NP of 350% since 9/1/2008.