why this board isn't healthy if you trade for a living

Discussion in 'Professional Trading' started by akdrmeb, May 20, 2009.

  1. I can't trade Jack's system because I'm not built for "glued to the terminal" trading systems. If you spend any amount of time in wl or strategy trading, you'll quickly find it's either ennui or periods of intense stress that prevent you from being successful. This is more common in intraday systems than EOD. I'll take a good EOD system any day over intraday systems.
     
    #291     Jun 1, 2009
  2. suma66

    suma66

    no your being a psychopath by repeating yourself and obsessing over jack's method. When people read what Jack writes and makes their own decision as to its value you can't seem to get past it. Your not ok with the fact that people think for themselves. You are stuck on anything Jack related. You can't seem to brush it aside.
     
    #292     Jun 1, 2009
  3. suma66

    suma66

    Great so you found out what works for you. I'm sure your impoving your trading via the vast information available to you that is non Hershey related. I take it you are smart enough to let something go when it doesn't work and courtesy enough to post about what does and doesn't work. I see you can do this without being a psychopath and obsessing over things and repeating yourself day after day.
     
    #293     Jun 1, 2009
  4. You got a lotta nerve. :eek:

    You're the one using multiple-aliases, posting gay porn, using pro-hershey moderators ... and saying anything and everything to defend the indenfensible.

    Like the man said, "Go sell crazy someplace else, lady!"
     
    #294     Jun 1, 2009
  5. suma66

    suma66

    I don't have multiple aliases. Even if I did it shouldn't be something to bring up every time I ask you a legitimate question. A question like why do you feel the need to endlessly criticsize a method of trading that you've already determined doesn't work? Is this the best way you can think of utilizing your time? At the end of the day what is it exactly that you and trader666 are trying to accomplish.

    Don't go off on a rant about other shit. These are strait forward questions and you keep avoiding them. Nothing personal either.
     
    #295     Jun 1, 2009
  6. suma66

    suma66

    all I hear is crickets
     
    #296     Jun 1, 2009
  7. Not true

    The legitimacy of a question is in the eye of the beholder. For now, since you appear to be serious, I'll answer you as such.
    Remember, we are all individuals, so my reasons for doing something won't be the same as anyone else's. I hope everyone understands that.

    For me it's like someone saying "The sky is brown, when obviously it is blue".

    Pretty simple, huh?
    From this past week I am sure you've seen I don't banter on the internet when I have better things to do. As far as what we've been doing tonight, I would see this as rather engaging banter banter amongst my trading peers, nothing more, and nothing less.
    I believe I've given you straightforward answers as well.
    ***
    And by that same token, one would ask why you go to such great lengths to defend jack hershey?

    1) Why do you endlessly promote the jack hershey, SCT methods, which don't work?
    2) Why do you do everything but provide proof of the method working, when if it did, proving it would be pretty easy.
    3) Why do you defend jack hershey's lies, rants, obfuscations and inane prattling?
    4) Do you really feel that this is the best use of your time?
    5) At the end of the day exactly what is it that you are trying to accomplish?
    These are straightforward questions, so don't keep avoiding them.
     
    #297     Jun 1, 2009
  8. LOL :D
     
    #298     Jun 1, 2009
  9. suma66

    suma66

    ... so if I say the sky is brown will you relentlessly be asking me for proof?

    ... I admit you don't spend every single day stalking and bashing Jack. What does that say for Trader666 then who spends every waking moment of his life attacking Jack?

    ... No you didn't. Those were not straitforward answers they were more of a sidestep like most all of the answers you give. I wanted to know specifically... What are you trying to accomplish? What is it that you expect all of your critcsizing and bashing to achieve?
    At least you gave somewhat of an answer, I'd love to hear what Trader666 has to say.

    Don't mistake taking shots at you fools for promoting Jack. I have never traded his system nor do I know much about it.

    Once again, being that I have never traded his system, I would never be able to prove it. I don't believe that a system can be proven, I believe its the trader who can prove himself if anything. You have proved yourself to be obsessed with finding "proof". Whether you ever find proof or not all of the bickering and ranting you do is entertaining none the less pretty god damn funny and fascinating that so much time is wasted on that.
    I'm not actually defending him just making fun of you. If you think for a second you can realize that.
    For now, yes, I am getting a pretty good laugh and lately I need that. I have accomplished a lot the past couple weeks and I can afford to sit back and mess around with some internet trolls.
    I am trying to accomplish a couple things. First and foremost as I said I'm trying to get a good laugh. Second I thought maybe I can get other people to laugh by clearly stating how you fools are obsessed with relentlessy stalking Jack asking for proof and bashing anyone affiliated with him. And other people did get a laugh too so I did accomplish that. Lastly I wanted to see if looking into Jacks method and was worth doing. I mean there is no other trading method out of the vast amount of methods on this site that gets even a tenth of the attention that this one does. If it really was so obvious to be a fraud there would be less talk about it let alone people like yourselves who spend so much time stalking Jack. But I probably won’t because like I said above I believe only the individual trader can be responsible for being profitable through learning things on his own whether or not he has guidance from others.

    Keep avoiding? I don't think I've been asked these questions before. I find it funny when you say such dumb shit like that. Actually you avoid questions pertaining to the following: Backing out of a trading challenge via absurd "conditions". and... Trying to convince people that it is normal for someone to relentlessly bash and stalk someone in a hopes to find proof of their method.

    So there I gave LEGITIMATE answers and didn't sidestep anything. I predict you will brush this post aside as it really makes you look like an ass. I'm sure you regret getting into an exchange of words with me as it is more reassurance to everyone on this site as to what a fool you are.

    I rest my case.

    [​IMG]
     
    #299     Jun 1, 2009
  10. suma66

    suma66

    [​IMG]



    LOL!!!
     
    #300     Jun 1, 2009